TA-152C Test velocity: Data vs Game. - Printable Version
+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Discussion Section 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=292)
+---- Thread: TA-152C Test velocity: Data vs Game. (/showthread.php?tid=60323)
+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Discussion Section 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=292)
+---- Thread: TA-152C Test velocity: Data vs Game. (/showthread.php?tid=60323)
TA-152C Test velocity: Data vs Game. - Paulo Hirth - 28.03.2009
A litle test at 9500m, with MW50 in stable fly:
![[Image: ta152compare.jpg]](http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/9772/ta152compare.jpg)
By null at 2009-03-28
In Real life 745, in game 680, my only hope is a New Slot of this nice plane Ta-152, with revised Velocity, aceleration, retention and FM.
![[Image: extview.jpg]](http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/9462/extview.jpg)
By null at 2009-03-28
Is there a tutorial to build a new slot plane?
- Onecheman - 28.03.2009
Yes, I'm with you Paulo, this plane sucks in aceleration... the engine don't work that the expectation. :wink:
- Junkers - 28.03.2009
EnsignRo Wrote:Ingame Ta152C uses DB603L engine....that engine (ingame) has 1665hp (2080hp with mw50).Real Ta152C used DB603LA engine....that engine has 2100hp (2300hp with mw50)......
I agree with you Paulo, we need a new Ta-152 with a new slot that has a DB603LA engine. Now we just need a modder.
EDIT: I just realised that according to your screenshots the Ta-152 already has a DB603LA engine, intriguing.
- FlyingFinn - 28.03.2009
That's strange because I'm getting 730km/h with ease.
![[Image: tank.jpg]](http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d59/GaZe9/tank.jpg)
- Junkers - 28.03.2009
Quote:That's strange because I'm getting 730km/h with ease.
In level flight or did you dive from a higher altitude?
- FlyingFinn - 28.03.2009
What do you think Sherlock?
Level flight of course.
- ptg - 28.03.2009
Quote:That's strange because I'm getting 730km/h with ease.
That's still 15km/h under rl performance...
- Junkers - 28.03.2009
Quote:What do you think Sherlock?I guessed that but something has to explain the difference.
Level flight of course.
Did you close the radiator, and what fuel quantity did you use.
- FlyingFinn - 28.03.2009
25% fuel, closed rad, 110% power, MW50 toggled.
- Paulo Hirth - 28.03.2009
So lets go all here test a fly, at 9500, with MW50, rad opened in VERY STABLE FLY, sry but impossible 730 easy.
- Paulo Hirth - 28.03.2009
Lol! Closed rad? You are will over head before finnish the test in stable fly.
- Slow - 28.03.2009
Switch overheating off :wink:
- Paulo Hirth - 28.03.2009
LOL!! :lol:
- FlyingFinn - 28.03.2009
More accurate testing over water:
![[Image: tank2.jpg]](http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d59/GaZe9/tank2.jpg)
1. 25% fuel, radiator closed
2. 25% fuel, radiator open
3. 100% fuel, radiator closed
4. 100% fuel, radiator open
*edit*
Dammit, I'm messing the numbers up
- Junkers - 28.03.2009
Quote:So lets go all here test a fly, at 9500, with MW50, rad opened in VERY STABLE FLY, sry but impossible 730 easy.
With the above criteria, 100% fuel and Default ammo I managed 688Km/h...