MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - Printable Version

MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - Printable Version

+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: Announcements & General Discussions & Hyper Lobby (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=264)
+--- Forum: General Discussions. (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=298)
+--- Thread: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a (/showthread.php?tid=69630)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - RedChico - 23.11.2010

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:So you refuse to provide a quote of where you think you explained it already?

Or are you just purposely avoiding doing so because you know you didn't and any attempt by you to fake it would only highlight the fact that you didn't

I am sure it is the latter

But here is your chance to prove me wrong

Provide the quote

Or bow out of this thread because you weak attempt to turn this into a flame fest is not working

Thanks!

You'll find this quite familiar:

Ace if you have any specific questions about my F1 reference that you think you don't understand.

I am all ears

But if all you want to do is to loop around over and over and over and over and over and over...

Well good on you

Just don't expect me to follow you tit for tat

PS: feel free to PM me if you want to ask a dumb question to save face here in the forum.

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - KG64_Cnopicilin - 24.11.2010

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:
RedChico Wrote:Not avoiding anything, you the one avoiding it by saying things like this:
"But here is your chance to prove me wrong"

Like you some kind of saint.

My inicial Formula 1 reference/comparison was quite clear.

The Fact that you were baited by Cnopicilin and you still loop around useless parts of discussions, cause the initial question on this thread was already responded, proves his point.

So you keep looping around your suposed flame war.

Thank you.
So you refuse to provide a quote of where you think you explained it already?

Or are you just purposely avoiding doing so because you know you didn't and any attempt by you to fake it would only highlight the fact that you didn't

I am sure it is the latter

But here is your chance to prove me wrong

Provide the quote

Or bow out of this thread because you weak attempt to turn this into a flame fest is not working

Thanks!

You're not in a fair, aren't you?

You can't compare an old one to upgraded and a lot better version.

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - ACE-OF-ACES - 28.11.2010

RedChico Wrote:You'll find this quite familiar:

Ace if you have any specific questions about my F1 reference that you think you don't understand.

I am all ears

But if all you want to do is to loop around over and over and over and over and over and over...

Well good on you

Just don't expect me to follow you tit for tat

PS: feel free to PM me if you want to ask a dumb question to save face here in the forum.

So you refuse to provide a quote of where you think you explained it already?

Or are you just purposely avoiding doing so because you know you didn't and any attempt by you to fake it would only highlight the fact that you didn't

I am sure it is the latter

But here is your chance to prove me wrong

Provide the quote

Or bow out of this thread because you weak attempt to turn this into a flame fest is not working

Thanks!

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - ACE-OF-ACES - 28.11.2010

KG64_Cnopicilin Wrote:
ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:
RedChico Wrote:Not avoiding anything, you the one avoiding it by saying things like this:
"But here is your chance to prove me wrong"

Like you some kind of saint.

My inicial Formula 1 reference/comparison was quite clear.

The Fact that you were baited by Cnopicilin and you still loop around useless parts of discussions, cause the initial question on this thread was already responded, proves his point.

So you keep looping around your suposed flame war.

Thank you.
So you refuse to provide a quote of where you think you explained it already?

Or are you just purposely avoiding doing so because you know you didn't and any attempt by you to fake it would only highlight the fact that you didn't

I am sure it is the latter

But here is your chance to prove me wrong

Provide the quote

Or bow out of this thread because you weak attempt to turn this into a flame fest is not working

Thanks!
You're not in a fair, aren't you?

You can't compare an old one to upgraded and a lot better version.

Agreed the color red is nice

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - RedChico - 29.11.2010

Do you even know what you're looping around?
Or are you just being thick skulled?
Me flamming? Hell, i even came in your defence, if you care to READ my post.
You talk about teaching and being taught, do you have any kind of initiative? Instead of posting insulting remarks why didn't you just said "i don't know what F1 is".

Its incredible, in every topic of conversation you just have to be right at all costs and you insult everyone.
Why don't you go to another forum, i know of one where you are welcome. Big Grin

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - ACE-OF-ACES - 29.11.2010

RedChico Wrote:Do you even know what you're looping around?
Or are you just being thick skulled?
Me flamming? Hell, i even came in your defence, if you care to READ my post.
You talk about teaching and being taught, do you have any kind of initiative? Instead of posting insulting remarks why didn't you just said "i don't know what F1 is".

Its incredible, in every topic of conversation you just have to be right at all costs and you insult everyone.
Why don't you go to another forum, i know of one where you are welcome.

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - KG64_Cnopicilin - 29.11.2010

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:
RedChico Wrote:Do you even know what you're looping around?
Or are you just being thick skulled?
Me flamming? Hell, i even came in your defence, if you care to READ my post.
You talk about teaching and being taught, do you have any kind of initiative? Instead of posting insulting remarks why didn't you just said "i don't know what F1 is".

Its incredible, in every topic of conversation you just have to be right at all costs and you insult everyone.
Why don't you go to another forum, i know of one where you are welcome.
So you refuse to provide a quote of where you think you explained it already?

Or are you just purposely avoiding doing so because you know you didn't and any attempt by you to fake it would only highlight the fact that you didn't

I am sure it is the latter

But here is your chance to prove me wrong

Provide the quote

Or bow out of this thread because you weak attempt to turn this into a flame fest is not working

Thanks!

And round'n'round it goes. You've had it explained, now just start flame war for other small thing nobody really cares about.

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - ACE-OF-ACES - 29.11.2010

KG64_Cnopicilin Wrote:And round'n'round it goes. You've had it explained, now just start flame war for other small thing nobody really cares about.

Ah I see you fell for RedChico's trick

The point is simple

Long story short RedChico made a reference to something I did not understand..

I politely asked him to explain his reference

He did not explain it and than went on some other rant..

When I asked him again to explain his reference he claimed he already explained it and refused to explain it again and tried to imply all sorts of things about me

It was at that point I asked him to provide me a quote of where he felt his explained it to me already

So I am not asking him to explain it again, I am asking him to show me where he thinks he explained it to me the first time before he started to accuse me of all sorts of things

Long story short he is trying to cover his arse with regards to trying to imply that I am stupid for not understanding the expatiation he never provided in the first place

I hope that helps you understand

And I hope it helps you realize you should carefully read what is being said before you feel the need to jump in and pass judgment with your two cents

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - RedChico - 29.11.2010

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:The point is simple

Long story short RedChico made a reference to something I did not understand..

Yes the point is simple, you're a prick, if you had the initiative of googling it, you would have the first link as the official site of F1.
But no you had to act dumb and inocent.

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:I politely asked him to explain his reference

Politeness is something that you don't grasp.

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:He did not explain it and than went on some other rant..

No rants.

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:When I asked him again to explain his reference he claimed he already explained it and refused to explain it again and tried to imply all sorts of things about me

If you really read my post the answer is in example i gave you.
Playing inocent again as usual.

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:It was at that point I asked him to provide me a quote of where he felt his explained it to me already

In the same manner you respond to other ppl, i was still thinking you would take a bit of effort by googling it.

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:So I am not asking him to explain it again, I am asking him to show me where he thinks he explained it to me the first time before he started to accuse me of all sorts of things

Don't be lazy google it, its even on the front page of the official site.

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:Long story short he is trying to cover his arse with regards to trying to imply that I am stupid for not understanding the expatiation he never provided in the first place

Long story short when you feel you're loosing (wich isn't really the point) an argument you start looping around pointless things, and over analysing/responding just like i'm doing now, irony indeed.

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:I hope that helps you understand

And I hope it helps you realize you should carefully read what is being said before you feel the need to jump in and pass judgment with your two cents

We all see your kind attitude. I think you some kind of holly man, you're not.

Thank you very much, teacher.

PS: get out of this thread.

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - ACE-OF-ACES - 29.11.2010

RedChico Wrote:
ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:The point is simple

Long story short RedChico made a reference to something I did not understand..

Yes the point is simple, you're a prick,

Look RedChico..

I know your upset at me for pointing out your 'methods'

But that is no excuse for you breaking forum rules..

Please refrain from calling me or any other forum members names for simply documenting the way you operate..

Thanks in advance

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - RedChico - 29.11.2010

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:
RedChico Wrote:
ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:The point is simple

Long story short RedChico made a reference to something I did not understand..

Yes the point is simple, you're a prick,
Look RedChico..

I know your upset at me for pointing out your 'methods'

But that is no excuse for you breaking forum rules..

Please refrain from calling me or any other forum members names for simply documenting the way you operate..

Thanks in advance

That was a fact statement. I want to see admin telling otherwise, because the posts are out there, if there's one person breaking rules are you, treating others like morons, insulting, but i bet you have your, as we say here, back warm and i'll be probably be the only one banned, but at least i don't have your prick attitude.

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - ACE-OF-ACES - 29.11.2010

RedChico Wrote:That was a fact statement. I want to see admin telling otherwise, because the posts are out there, if there's one person breaking rules are you, treating others like morons, insulting, but i bet you have your, as we say here, back warm and i'll be probably be the only one banned, but at least i don't have your prick attitude.

So you refuse to provide a quote of where you think you explained it already?

Or are you just purposely avoiding doing so because you know you didn't and any attempt by you to fake it would only highlight the fact that you didn't

I am sure it is the latter

But here is your chance to prove me wrong

Provide the quote

Or bow out of this thread because your weak attempt to turn this into a flame fest is not working

Thanks in advance!

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - RedChico - 29.11.2010

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:So you refuse to provide a quote of where you think you explained it already?

Or are you just purposely avoiding doing so because you know you didn't and any attempt by you to fake it would only highlight the fact that you didn't
Provide the quote

Or bow out of this thread because your weak attempt to turn this into a flame fest is not working

Here you go, my inicial post.

Quote:Like comparing P-51D-25 (IL2) Vs. P-51D-30 (real) like you did.

Or like comparing a Mclaren from the beginning of the current F1 season with the one they have now. Same model, yes, but diferent details.

On topic:
i'll repeat, Mig 9 would win, on a gun battle dogfight, one on one.
Just look at the wing geometry, its a fact back swept wings have less lift capability than a "similar" straight/elliptical wings.
Oh, and weight too.

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:Thanks in advance!

No problem glad to help. Big Grin

ACE-OF-ACES Wrote:But here is your chance to prove me wrong

Proved, you're a prick.

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - ACE-OF-ACES - 29.11.2010

Nice try

But quoting your 'original' statement that I already said I did not understand (read you lost me there) does not count as you explaining it after the fact

Allow me to show you the 'true' and 'full' sequence of events that show your true nature as opposed to your 'cherry picked' version

It all stated off with what you provided above..

To which I replied with the following (page 9)

Quote:ACE-OF-ACES

Quote:RedChico
Or like comparing a Mclaren from the beginning of the current F1 season with the one they have now. Same model, yes, but diferent details.
Ah..?

Ya lost me there

As you can see by my reply I did not understand your reference..

It was at this point you 'should' have replied back with a more detailed explanation..

But in your true 'troll' styled you replied with the following (page 9)

Quote:RedChico

Quote:ACE-OF-ACES
Ah..?

Ya lost me there
Ahahah, i see you'll never understand.

Now I can go on and show you how you later tried to act like you did explain it after the fact..

But why bother?

You will just go off on another spin spin tatic to try and hide your true nature

That and I think it is clear to all from your reply to me who set the tone of this thread and thus who the true 'prick' is

Re: MiG-9FS vs. Me-262A-1a - {HVY-E}Jinxx - 30.11.2010

Red, Ace,

This thread was supposed to be about the Mig-9 and the Me-262 and weather or not they saw combat against one another and what would happen for real.

Since this no longer seems to have gone off topic and has degraded into a flame war, I'm going to ask to have this thread locked.