P-3P51 Vs. C-0K3 - Printable Version

+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: Off Topic (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=275)
+--- Forum: Open Forum (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=342)
+--- Thread: P-3P51 Vs. C-0K3 (/showthread.php?tid=71526)

---

Re: P-3P51 Vs. C-0K3 - Korrigan - 09.09.2010

Cnopicilin, it's definitly one of the the funniest topic I read here, thank you so much for this ! :lol: :)

---

Re: P-3P51 Vs. C-0K3 - OhFrustration - 10.09.2010

So it seems I'll have to start drinking Pepsi instead of Coke... After all, a scientific research is always better than an opinion! :wink: :lol:

---

Re: P-3P51 Vs. C-0K3 - ACE-OF-ACES - 26.10.2010

KG64_Cnopicilin Wrote:If your a big fan of the Pepsi


Like I am..


Than you may want to consider Pepsi over Coke!


Why?


Well long story short Coke hasn't made much changes to the recipe since the 1880's.


As a mater of FACT Pepsi made changes to dozens of the flavour things of the original Coke secret recipe..


With regards to pepsi including a copy of Coke..


I have yet to get a straight answer as to what version of coke is included in pepsi


It is coke 1880's,1900's, 2010's?


And if it is 1880's how do you apply the E331?


But I digress


In the case of Pepsi reduced the bubble amount in cubic inch (BBC) and taste in 1 liter (TIL) of ye olde coke..


At that time the folks over at Pepsi said they made the changes to Coke to make them 'more caffeinated' wise..


Based on their research at that time..


Luckily some folks like me pointed out that their research was 'lacking' and their test methods were in 'error' (didn't use the std atm map) and that the changes they made actually resulted in 'less caffeinated' taste..


The good news is that in Pepsi Vanilla release 2.0 they made more changes to the coke cherry to increase the top bubble count and rate of pärinä..


That is tos say in Pepsi Vanilla 2.0 the un-did some of the changes they made in the older versions..


The bad news is they did not un-do all the changes and thus did not fully restore them to their original Vanilla bubble values..


That is to say the Pepsi version of Pepsi Ltd in teh 1970's are still slower and don't bubble as well as the original Coke..


What does that mean to you?


Well if you drink in "one the road" in a road that has speed limit of 120Mph..


Your Pepsi will be easier to drink and pärinä is better than those using drinking the same era coke...


To make an analogy..


It is like the Coke users got the late Friday afternoon production line coke (red lemon) and your got the early morning bright eyed and motivated production line version of pepsi


In short if you use Pepsi you will have a performance edge coke users..


On a related note..


Pepsi also made changes to dozens of the original Coke taste verticles, EMD substances..


Which has to do with the caffeine..


I'm told that the Coke has more of a glass jaw when it comes to 'damage'


But I have not come up with a good way to test that to prove it to myself..


So take that with a grain of salt..


All in all as noted pepsi made changes (FM, EMD, etc..) to dozens of the coke indegredients..


On that note..


To all of you coke users out there that thought you witnessed a hacker pass you by in the same recipe..


Keep in mind that it may be a simple case of them using Pepsi!


I have not finished checking all the taste changes yet..


So I can only assume that some of the coke bubbles Pepsi changed will perform better and some perform worse as is the case for ye olde coca cola..


But once I am done I will post my findings!


On that note here is an example of the type of testing I do..


Based on SJack's zOMGITSALIVE data use by all to generate Vo/Max data files..


Case in point the taste..


Let's compare the Pepsi "on the rocks" to the Coke "on the rocks"


This icludes both, Coke and pepsi "on the rocks" on different temperatures without stir:



As you can see pepsi has a max bubble amount of ~4200Bpm where as Coke 1800's has an Bubble amount of only ~3500Bpm


That is a difference of nearly 700Bpm! OMG!


And as anyone in the know knows that the bubble max (BMX) testing of WWII is analogous to the modern energy methods Ps testing which is a measure of excess power. Excess power which is analogous to bubble-activity..


But as noted above..


Coce caved to the pressure by folks like me who pointed out their research was lacking and their test methods were in error and added back some of the BMX in version Coke in the 1800's


With that said let's compare the pepsi vanilla to the cherry coke


Taste connections with Coke cherry and pepsi vanilla:



As you can see Coke has an max BMX of ~4200fpm edge over Pepsi max BMX of ~3900fpm


But that is just wrt the max BMX!


Note that at just about every temperature Pepsi performs better than Coke


Now let's compare the Pepsi 1970s to coke 1990's


heat loss/minute/amount in "pipes"



As you can see Coke has a max HLM of ~445F/H where as Pepsi has an max HLM of only ~435F/H


That is a difference of nearly 10F/H!


And as anyone in the know knows colder is better!


But as noted above..


Coke caved to the pressure by folks like me who pointed out their research was lacking and their test methods were in error and added back some of the HLM in version from the 1980's


With that said let's compare the Coke from 2010's TSPA to the Pepsi TSPA



As you can see Pepsi has an max K/Dn of ~445mph edge over Coke max K/Dn of ~438mph

But that is just wrt the max K/Dn!

Note that at just about every temperature Pepsi tastes better than Coke.

Hope this cleared it out.

ROTFL!

Well you know the old saying..

Imitation is the highest form of flattery

Or was it...

forgive them lord for they mock what they dont understand

Actully either or in this case!

---