IL-2 Sturmovik: Me109 and AHS Mods by HunInTheSun aka Vike - Printable Version

+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Discussion Section 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=292)
+---- Thread: IL-2 Sturmovik: Me109 and AHS Mods by HunInTheSun aka Vike (/showthread.php?tid=51671)

---

- Hot Space - 17.12.2007

This one looks really good - Can't wait 8)

---

- HunInTheSun - 17.12.2007

Daimler Wrote:What guns will be there in this G10 E . . . from G2 like this hood ??? 1 x 20 and 2 x 7,92 mm ?

Don't worry mate,my G10-Erla is a ingame-stock-G10 replacement,that means you'll retrieve MG131 and MK108 with the normal MW50 boosted DB605-D

-----------------------------------



Ok guys,that's finished. :!:

A friend of mine noticed that even if the Me109-G4 had a fixed tailwheel,this wheel could be in a style like the previous 109 models:

See here:
- http://109lair.hobbyvista.com/walkaroun ... 0ar_03.JPG
(from the G4 W.Nr. 19310 page at 109lair)



So i added "wheelstyles" files in my G4 mod,so that you can choose the style of wheels you want:

-Classic style wheels (>like Early109s)
-Late style wheels (>like G6 onwards,see my G4 screenshots on page 1 )
-Or a mix of both styles.

That works without any bug,i.e.:
Take-off/landings/crashlandings/undercarriage animation=>>>ALL IS OK)


Example with Classic style Tailwheel:





BTW,i found that the Royal Hungarian Air Force had small numbers of G4 (see here)


So,finally,i made the G4 for every "Axis nationality" except the Finnish one as they didn't have G4 IRL.

Example of a Slovak Me109-G4:





Right now,i send the files to MrJolly (G4 and G10Erla Mod + Clean Erla Hood + Alternate Armor plates)



Salute and thanks for all your good comments! :wink:

---

- Hunin - 17.12.2007

*sound of champagne bottle beeing opened*

---

- Daimler - 17.12.2007

LAL_RONE Wrote:Interresting, but if I use your G4 (original G2 in game) in dogfight online session, I will cheat ... because with your new G4 cockpit, I enjoy an outstanding rear view ....

You"ll not cheat because you"ll fly a historical correct G-4 not G-2. :? . . . are you affraid ?

THX mr.HunInTheSun , I missed this plane looong time . . . .

---

- Jump_Pilot - 17.12.2007

Brophmeister Wrote:Of course it isn't a cheat. All it does is change the outside appearence. Weapons and FM are not touched.

And give you a better review when everyone else on a nonmod server are expecting you to be in a G2 with an armor plate behind your head. You forgot to mention that. That's why it should replace something like the 109Z instead. It's something not normally used.

---

- Jump_Pilot - 17.12.2007

RAF_Magpie Wrote:Is this really anymore of a 'cheat' than say, a P-51-D with a Mirror?

Is it really anymore of a 'cheat' than say, a Spit Mk-9 with a K-14/Gyro sight?

No. I dont think so.

At least you admit it. It is an unfair advantage with the review. I really think the maker did a great job. The only problem I have with any of these is when/if people use them on nonmod servers.

---

- Brophmeister - 18.12.2007

It gives you minimal improvement over the rear view. You can see upwards behind you, but you can't see straight behind you as you can in, for example, the FW190. I really don't understand why you must insist on arguing over a small improvement and let all the things like mirrors and gunsights go.

---

- RAF_Magpie - 18.12.2007

Brophmeister Wrote:It gives you minimal improvement over the rear view. You can see upwards behind you, but you can't see straight behind you as you can in, for example, the FW190. I really don't understand why you must insist on arguing over a small improvement and let all the things like mirrors and gunsights go.

I wasnt continuing the argument on those Mr Brophmeister. I was responding to the insinuation of this being a possible cheat.

---

- Brophmeister - 18.12.2007

Woah, hang on. I was responding to jump_pilot.

---

- RAF_Magpie - 18.12.2007

Brophmeister Wrote:Woah, hang on. I was responding to jump_pilot.

RGR... Sorry :oops: Its hard to know when ya under attack or not sometimes

At anyrate - come on! We're dying here... when do we get it...


OOooooo is it our Christmas present???

---

- Brophmeister - 18.12.2007

RAF_Magpie Wrote:

Brophmeister Wrote:Woah, hang on. I was responding to jump_pilot.

RGR... Sorry :oops: Its hard to know when ya under attack or not sometimes

At anyrate - come on! We're dying here... when do we get it...


OOooooo is it our Christmas present???

No wuckas, its hard to follow when everything degrades into a poop flinging competition (hint hint for everyone thats ever had a bitch rant)

And yes, +1 on the where is it? I believe that the mod is complete and awaiting admin approval, but still....

---

- HunInTheSun - 18.12.2007

Brophmeister Wrote:And yes, +1 on the where is it? I believe that the mod is complete and awaiting admin approval, but still....

All right people.

I just saw a "WIP Download" section in this forum,where i put a link there.

Me109-G4 and Me109-G10 Erla + Some goodies => Links here

Feel free to report any possible bug! :!:

But normally,if you install this properly,all should be ok!


Enjoy and Merry Christmas!!!

---

- Brewster - 18.12.2007

HunInTheSun Wrote:Thanks ROne.

I search some infos about the different nationalities which used the G4:


Finland: NO G4 used.

According to these sites,there were only G2/G6/G8 and G14 provided to Finland for about 160 Messerschmitt.

- http://ipmsstockholm.org/magazine/2000/ ... 109_01.htm

- http://www.sci.fi/~fta/me-fin-1.htm

[quote="ballenato"]Why not use K4 Engine cowling for G10?, technically was the same engine under (605D). So i think is more historically correct k4 than G2.

[b]"Erla-manufactured G10s are the most misidentified ones, and have been often referred as G10/AS in the past. Firstly, they did not use the fuselage

---

- RGAF_JESTER - 18.12.2007

LAL_RONE Wrote:

RGAF_JESTER Wrote:most full cockpit server do not allow for mod usage anyway so its not much of an issue

Because you really think that a server is able to forbid acces to player who use mod .... ?

yes places that use rdl 2 i think do not allow you to join the, it doesnt even need to be a server commander or FBD its for anyone hosting, if you dont want the sound mod in your game use RDL 2

or Rundll or something along those lines,

---

- Trooper117 - 18.12.2007

Good work..
You know, I marvel at the effort that people put in using their own time and energy to give us all a more realistic and improved game.. But it is really gripping my sh*t that every time someone provides us with these gems, ther are always people coming out of the woodwork whinging about 'you have a cheat' or 'that will give you more of an advantage..' Can we just accept the great work these modders do, and stop crying about what amounts to f^ck-all to worry about..
And before you ask, yes, I spend a large amount of time flying online.. We have a large organisation, fly in most of the current wars, we've been doing it for years, and have yet to see any kind of cheating.. why, because we fly with people we know and trust..

---