[MOD] *NEW* Slot A/C & Wpn (Fw-190F-8 & G-8) (8.0) - Printable Version
+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Download New Aircraft (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=290)
+---- Thread: [MOD] *NEW* Slot A/C & Wpn (Fw-190F-8 & G-8) (8.0) (/showthread.php?tid=64195)
+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Download New Aircraft (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=290)
+---- Thread: [MOD] *NEW* Slot A/C & Wpn (Fw-190F-8 & G-8) (8.0) (/showthread.php?tid=64195)
- bearcat83 - 05.10.2009
about the MK 103 loadouts: the FW-190F/G are supposed to be ground attack aircrafts, why do this gunpods have the normal loadout with mostly high explosive (HE) rounds? i would think they would have more armor piercing rounds(AP) because anti tank duty is the main reason for these 30mm guns?!
maybe you can change it into something like AP-AP-HE or AP only or add one MK103 (AP only) loadout or is this hardcoded?
this would make them tankdestroyer in the first place, something i am badly missing to do with the FW190 on east front! what do you guys think?
- TinyTim - 07.10.2009
bearcat83 Wrote:about the MK 103 loadouts: the FW-190F/G are supposed to be ground attack aircrafts, why do this gunpods have the normal loadout with mostly high explosive (HE) rounds? i would think they would have more armor piercing rounds(AP) because anti tank duty is the main reason for these 30mm guns?!
maybe you can change it into something like AP-AP-HE or AP only or add one MK103 (AP only) loadout or is this hardcoded?
this would make them tankdestroyer in the first place, something i am badly missing to do with the FW190 on east front! what do you guys think?
That's a very good idea in my opinion! I don't really know what the ammo loadout was on the MK-103 for antitank duties historically, but it can't be far from your suggestions. One problem will be encountered tho - by the time the MK-103 becomes available on Fw190, all russian tanks on the front are tough as hell, being very hard to destroy even with antitank stuka, and not very easy even with a Hs-129 with that 75mm cannon!
- bearcat83 - 07.10.2009
i found this: http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/ ... un-am.html
" 30 mm high-velocity (MK 101, MK 103)
1 Sprenggranatpatrone L'Spur o. Zerl -> means(HE)
1 Minengescho
- ROSOBORONEXPORTCORP - 07.10.2009
I've always wondered about this. It would be nice to see some historical references on it.
- akdavis - 07.10.2009
[quote]MK103 30mm tungsten-carbide core armour-piercing tracer, with additional incendiary effect, for use against heavy tanks. Not self-destructive.
Muzzle-velocity: 960m/sec
Penetration: 70mm armour plater at 60
- bearcat83 - 09.10.2009
so hopefully we
Missing canopy - Strafe - 13.10.2009
Goblin Wrote:Thank you for the mod Danzi, only problem I've this plane shown in game WITHOUT CANOPY :-?
Please take alook at my mod 7.0 thread at http://allaircraftsimulations.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=19058
There may be a conflicting mod... not sure why because I have all the mods installed and it seems to work ok on my PC... does the original F-8 show that behavior? what mods do you have?
hope you get it going...
viewtopic.php?t=19058&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15
... original F-8 not showing that behavior, I've tested this on "clean" 4.08 and "clean" 4.08+Fw-190D11&13 and "clean" U@P v 1.7 instalation :???:
Hmmm.... I am at a loss. I have ran into some problems during my latest attempt with a different plane... I will look into this but at this moment I don't have an estimate of the time... have some family issues at the moment that are taking 100% of my time.
First of all I would like to say thank you "danzigzag" for those amazing new slots planes. Really good ones.
IMHO, I guess the problem with missing canopies on Fw190D9 and F8 are due DZZ uses bubble canopy.
I have 2 installs here: UI111 and UP 1.7. In UI111 it works fine no problem at all, I don't have flat canopy installed on it. But I got missing canopy in UP1.7, it uses flat canopy. I'm so sorry but I'm newbie to try to solve that.
- akdavis - 14.10.2009
Another little note on the Fw-190 Mk 103 trials: they were not considered successful due to poor accuracy achieved with the combination.
Re: Missing canopy - leszek957 - 15.10.2009
Strafe Wrote:... I'm so sorry but I'm newbie to try to solve that.Ha, It looks like "problem of mod standarisation"
http://il2ultrapack.net46.net/index.php ... 405.0.html
So... still waiting for F-8/G-8 Canopy :roll:
- Imp - 16.10.2009
you don't need the MK103 to make a good tank destroyer out of the 190, the Panzerblitz rockets should be perfect. except when i tried this mod the T34 were invulnerable to them even though according to a pilot that used them, two rockets were sufficient to knock out a T34 and a whole salvo to defeat an IS2
- akdavis - 16.10.2009
Imp Wrote:you don't need the MK103 to make a good tank destroyer out of the 190, the Panzerblitz rockets should be perfect. except when i tried this mod the T34 were invulnerable to them even though according to a pilot that used them, two rockets were sufficient to knock out a T34 and a whole salvo to defeat an IS2
It says the BRS-82 "graphics" are used as a sub for Panzerblitz II. If the damage model is also used, its penetration would be less than half that of the Panzerblitz system.
- FANATIC MODDER - 17.10.2009
viewtopic.php?p=252865#252865
I have a unexpected problem with the spinner...please check.