Chose a JAPANESE bomber! I will build it! [VOTE IS ENDED] - Printable Version

+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Discussion Section 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=292)
+---- Thread: Chose a JAPANESE bomber! I will build it! [VOTE IS ENDED] (/showthread.php?tid=63279)

---

- Tooslow - 20.07.2009

If I could I'd like to vote a second time for the G8N1 (Rita) as it really flew before the end of the war! The G10N1 did not!!

Also the US brought one of the G8N1 prototypes back to the US and flight tested it after the war. I can find no record of there flight reports. Does anyone else know of a source for this information?

---

VOTE - df-seb - 20.07.2009

H6K "Mavis" ----------------- +1

8)

---

- VikShloss - 20.07.2009

g10 anf the g8 are non entities due to poor numbers actually built and only ever entered test phase

the Aichi B7A is a good option as 150 built and used and was an efective fighter bomber for the ijn

---

- philhl - 20.07.2009

Tooslow Wrote:If I could I'd like to vote a second time for the G8N1 (Rita) as it really flew before the end of the war! The G10N1 did not!!

Also the US brought one of the G8N1 prototypes back to the US and flight tested it after the war. I can find no record of there flight reports. Does anyone else know of a source for this information?

I have some footage of the G8N1, it was a testflight in japan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmj9Dw8UlTs

The bad situation for the japanese was the only reason why this plane never reached higher production nummbers.

---

- jeanba - 20.07.2009

A ki-49 would be nice

---

- _Sparky_ - 20.07.2009

all Gorgeous planes

but

I vote G10N1

---

- Jaegita - 20.07.2009

_Sparky_ Wrote:all Gorgeous planes

but

I vote G10N1

:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :newsmile:

---

- philhl - 20.07.2009

THE VOTE IS OVER!

PLEASE DO NOT VOTE FURTHER!!


THE WINNER IS:

G10N1

---

- Ion_Milu' - 20.07.2009

HEIL! LOL :lol: I can't wait for this plane Good luck building it

---

- ojcar - 20.07.2009

Beautiful plane, by the way......Six engines and how many cockpits?
Now you are going to build this in the next 50 years or so (or maybe two weeks.....be sure!)

---

- Guest - 20.07.2009

Will there be all of the various configurations?

---

- Jure_502 - 21.07.2009

Oh no. This little light that shines to new JPN aircraft, to make some intense battles of PTO, the light goes to aircraft that didn't do even a little harm to enemy's army. Really a big shame.

But nevermind, let's satisfy child's imagination, but, will it ever end?

---

- WOEI - 21.07.2009

Yep, it's such a shame...We need some real Japanese bombers...

Well I'm not going to whine over it. Shit happens.

---

- Bee - 21.07.2009

LW/KG10_BlackKnight Wrote:Well I'm not going to whine over it. Shit happens.

I don't think it will.

---

- XabaRus-1 - 21.07.2009

OK this is from wikipedia

Quote:Project Z called for three variations on the airframe: 4,000 bombers, 5,000 transports (capable of carrying 600 troops), and 2,000 strafing attack aircraft, which would carry 400 downward-firing machine guns in the fuselage, for intense ground attacks at the rate of 6,400 rounds per second.

400 machine guns? Is that for real or a typo? Seriously is this going to happen. In terms of what if planes this takes the biscuit.

---