Correcting the Jets - Printable Version
+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Discussion Section 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=292)
+---- Thread: Correcting the Jets (/showthread.php?tid=51122)
+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Discussion Section 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=292)
+---- Thread: Correcting the Jets (/showthread.php?tid=51122)
Correcting the Jets - ROSOBORONEXPORTCORP - 06.11.2007
Hello,
I know editing flight models is against the rules but I think an exception should be made for these three cases:
- Decrease the thrust of the LAGG-RD (to 500kg)
- Cause the tail of the TA-183 to snap off at maximum speed
- Introduce instability at high speed to mimick the wing warping of the He-162D
- Prevent high speed movement of throttle on Yak-15, Mig-9 and Me-163
Additionally, deletion of the outer wing racks on the Ar-234 would be realistic. It would also be interesting to mount X-4 on them (this is more plausible than the TA-183 X-4 option which should be removed).
- Faucon - 07.11.2007
It's just my point of view. I dont think that many people fly those planes, so really not a priority. And they already have lots of "more importants" things to change in this game, before looking FMs ( then touching FMs... Dont know, scared me O_o ).
- uf_josse - 07.11.2007
And please, don't modify FM....... :roll:
- Lo0n - 07.11.2007
yeah - really don't touch the fm's, thats a can of worms that is being (wisely) avoided by those with the tools.
- Sojka - 07.11.2007
Lo0n Wrote:yeah - really don't touch the fm's, thats a can of worms that is being (wisely) avoided by those with the tools.+1
- Trooper117 - 07.11.2007
Agreed on both counts.. A very small minority fly the 'what if' and jet scenarios.. Not exactly loads of campaigns and missions made since their release.. I know that's cold comfort for the few that are into that scene, but there has to be priorities.. :|
- Skunkmeister - 07.11.2007
Modifying sounds, map textures, default skins, adding new flyables = extending life of Il2.
Modifying FM's and DM's = death of Il2.
- Martin98 - 07.11.2007
+1000!!!!
don't touch that!
- Aymar_Mauri - 07.11.2007
So, the same religious dogmas apply here at AAA?
- Sojka - 07.11.2007
Aymar_Mauri Wrote:So, the same religious dogmas apply here at AAA?yeh, and i hope it will stay this way..
- ROSOBORONEXPORTCORP - 07.11.2007
Interesting.
Fine, all do it myself...
- Sojka - 07.11.2007
ROSOBORONEXPORTCORP Wrote:Interesting.worst of luck..
Fine, all do it myself...
- Bandit Bill - 07.11.2007
I think it would be inadviseable to modify existing OM coded FM's, simply because of the cheat potential.
New aircraft? I think it is a different story - but i have the feeling that the MACKing community may find this unrealistic as a goal.. i'm sure the FM's coding is complex beyond the average mortals ability to significantly change/code without the tools that OM has been using in development of the series.
Changing FM's would be more detrimental, than beneficial to the overall community, I think.
- Loon - 07.11.2007
ROSOBORONEXPORTCORP Wrote:Interesting.
Fine, all do it myself...
So, if you can do it by yoursefl, why did u request such changes?
Anyway, none of the here "posters" did ask about changeing the FM nor DM anytime. Now you show up and say that this and that FM should be changed argueing curious reasons. Well, lad, guess this is not your forum, especially after saying you'll do it by yourself.
Best wishes, m8 :roll:
Re: Correcting the Jets - Lo0n - 07.11.2007
ROSOBORONEXPORTCORP Wrote:... deletion of the outer wing racks on the Ar-234 would be realistic. It would also be interesting to mount X-4 on them (this is more plausible than the TA-183 x-4 option which should be removed).
this is the worrying bit dude, realistic and plausible to who, may i ask? considering the x-4's weren't used operationally, and (as far as i know) the Ta-183 was designed with the x-4's in mind, certainly with the pylons for weapons. the ar234 was a bomber, not bomber interceptor, so how having x-4's is more plausible i cannot see. and (again as far as i know) the ar234 had the outer wing racks, otherwise it would have a meagre strike capability.
edit two loons eh, damn that split personality