All-Aircraft-Simulations
Messerschmitt 109TL - Printable Version

+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Discussion Section 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=292)
+---- Thread: Messerschmitt 109TL (/showthread.php?tid=51479)

Pages: 1 2

Messerschmitt 109TL - RealDarko - 01.12.2007

Will love to see this one someday Smile


[Image: 2m3leh5.jpg]

- F22-Raptor-2006 - 01.12.2007

umm...

262 engines?

262 fuesalage and tail?

not sure about wings and elevators though

- Bandit Bill - 01.12.2007

Take with a half-cup of salt.. considering the source.


http://www.luft46.com/mess/me109tl.html
Quote:The Messerschmitt 109 Turbo-Lader Strahltriebwerk ( turbocharger jet engine) was proposed on January 22, 1943 at an RLM conference as a back-up for the Me 262, of which only three prototypes had been completed at the time. In order to cut down on design and production time, various components from existing aircraft was to be used. The fuselage from the Me 155B high-altitude fighter was to be used (with a new nose and tail section), the wing was from the Me 409 project and the undercarriage came from the Me 309. The armament was to be two MG 151/20 20mm cannon (120 rounds each) and two MK 103 30mm cannon, all in the nose. A later proposal included two MK 108 30mm cannon could be installed in the wing roots. The performance was estimated to be better than the Me 262 due to the Me 109 TL's narrower fuselage. Following intensive study, by March 1943 it was decided that so many modifications to the various components would be needed that no time would be gained over the Me 262 development, thus the project was abandoned. Please see below for Evan Mayerle's fictional technical history of the Me 109 TL...


- ={TTU}=Tomcat - 01.12.2007

hmm looks interesting and it's from our squadron so i will love to fly it ^^ but it reminds me to a Me-262 and a little to FW-190 donno why

- HH_Cipher - 01.12.2007

Wings

Ta152 H-1

Elevators

FW190

- F22-Raptor-2006 - 01.12.2007

ok judging by that webpage I think it'll probably better if we did use 109 fuesalage but with a 262 nose. Wings maybe from a Ta152? i'm still not sure about elevators because i don't take much notice of them lol. Could we contact Ranwers and see if he can do something?

- RAF_Magpie - 01.12.2007

I think i remember reading somewhere that testing proved that design superior to the 262 for some reason... cant remember what though or where Sad

- Hot Space - 01.12.2007

Do you mean here m8?

Click

- RAF_Magpie - 01.12.2007

yeah that's it i think Smile

Cheers,

- RealDarko - 02.12.2007

I believe that a 109 fuselage with 262 tail and nose and sire the Ta-152 wings with 262 engines.
Will be really cool!

- F22-Raptor-2006 - 02.12.2007

yes but we need ranwers and something for the elevators?

- RealDarko - 02.12.2007

Without Rangers, this plane is a No-go

- ROSOBORONEXPORTCORP - 02.12.2007

That data looks highly questionable. The figures I saw earlier suggested a speed less then the 262 (and the same armament)

- Hot Space - 03.12.2007

Ok, a bit more info on it:

Click

Click

Click

Over the few quick find Links above it does seen the that 262 was the better aircraft.

- Metatron - 03.12.2007

If that ever reached production I believe it would be fitted with an erla type canopy