G10N Fugaku - Printable Version
+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Discussion Section 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=292)
+---- Thread: G10N Fugaku (/showthread.php?tid=53717)
+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Discussion Section 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=292)
+---- Thread: G10N Fugaku (/showthread.php?tid=53717)
Pages:
1
2
G10N Fugaku - Pavel_RUS - 23.04.2008
Scope of a wing - 63,00 m
the Area covered 40,00 m - 330,000 м.кв.
Height - 8,80 m
Weight empty \ take-off - 33800 \ 70000 kg Speed - up to 750 km \
- handerson - 23.04.2008
Fast little plane
.
- Pavel_RUS - 23.04.2008
handerson Wrote:Fast little planeTOO LITLE
- Slow - 23.04.2008
Look, this kind of requests is what we need - at least a bit documented :roll:
- RAF_Magpie - 23.04.2008
kinda like a japanese B-29
be cool to have too
Re: G10N Fugaku - Slow - 23.04.2008
Pavel_RUS Wrote:Scope of a wing - 63,00 m
capacity 5000 h.p. each
Arms - up to 20000 kg of bombs.
Are you sure? 5.000 horsepower? That's like a double double-engine... Or a turboprop...
- Pavel_RUS - 23.04.2008
I'm shure........6 engines 5000 h.p each = 30.000 h.p
If u don't trust me look here http://www.airwar.ru/enc/bww2/g10n.html
- Checkyersix - 23.04.2008
20,000 KG of bombs. Holy crap!
- GentleKiller - 23.04.2008
Checkyersix Wrote:20,000 KG of bombs. Holy crap!
it is a nuke lol
- Slow - 24.04.2008
It's almost as heavy as that German flying wing bomber that could be a Flaktraeger with 4 88mm's in the air...
- handerson - 24.04.2008
5000 Hp engine was never inpossible 32 pistons and W config and it would be 40 litres.
- Pavel_RUS - 24.04.2008
handerson Wrote:5000 Hp engine was never inpossible 32 pistons and W config and it would be 40 litres.Loking here http://www.airwar.ru/enc/bww2/g10n.html
- Checkyersix - 24.04.2008
From Wikipedia:
"Project Z called for three variations on the airframe: 4,000 bombers, 5,000 transports (capable of carrying 600 troops), and 2,000 strafing attack aircraft, which would carry 400 downward-firing machine guns in the fuselage, for intense ground attacks at the rate of 6,400 rounds per second."
Now THAT's ambition.
- vanir - 24.04.2008
Drawing board designs are one thing but the Soviets had tremendous trouble developing turboprops to produce around 10,000shp. The most powerful at the time the Bear bomber was designed was 4800shp from a turboprop, still far more powerful than any piston engine (8 were fitted in pusher-pull config to get its circa. 800km/h top speed).
Let's keep in mind the complexity of the R-3350 engines used in the Superfortress and they developed some 2200hp for take off (but had excellent high altitude outputs). Even these motors used advanced technology for their time period, hence the severe serviceability issues in reality (the Superfortress reputation and project expenditure far exceeded its genuine achievements and it is best remembered as heralding the new age of post war aircraft technologies and requirements).
Getting this aircraft from paper to prototype I'm thinking was a case of wishful thinking, ambitious wishful thinking but totally unrealistic until the widespread introduction and development of turboprops and other advanced technologies and manufacturing procedures Japan was hardly in a position to ever experience at war with the Allied powers. I think the engineers didn't really know what technologies would be required to achieve their specifications at the time.
It's bad enough we have that ridiculous Ta-183 and the He-162 subtypes to put up with. The Lerche, well that could at least fly with a few modifications to the original design.
Sorry, but I'd be one vote against frivolous new aircraft slots :evil:
- RAF_Magpie - 24.04.2008
Well, personaly I dont mind seeing probable aircraft... My stance is still the same, if the modders wish to make it then fine. You have a point Vanir, japan had no ability to produce this beast - she couldnt even get her 4 engined bomber concept into production...
But Vanir, you bring up a good alternative to the production of this beast...
Could someone look at producing a Bear?
OT: What on earth is that beast in your avatar Vanir? Looks like its got character