il2 unrealism - jeesus - 03.12.2008
Biplane with upper wing removed behaves just like biplane with both wings removed.
- RAF_Brut - 03.12.2008
Well do you know why?
You're jeesus
You're the saviour
You can peform miracles.
lol.
Infact you don't even need a plane to fly, you already can
Also the walk on water ability, I class that as an exploit TBH!.
Re: il2 unrealism - Fusek - 03.12.2008
jeesus Wrote:Biplane with upper wing removed behaves just like biplane with both wings removed.
It crashes, yes.
-
P/O W. 'Moggy' Cattermole - 03.12.2008
they're designed to be aerodynamically stable with both wings; remove one and its shape is all wrong; it can't generate the lift it needs, or the remaining wing's control surfaces may not be enough to manoever it propperly.
- KG64_Ðørvånski - 03.12.2008
P/O W. 'Moggy' Cattermole Wrote:they're designed to be aerodynamically stable with both wings; remove one and its shape is all wrong; it can't generate the lift it needs, or the remaining wing's control surfaces may not be enough to manoever it propperly.
what he says! lol :wink:
Re: il2 unrealism - BF109boy - 03.12.2008
jeesus Wrote:Biplane with upper wing removed behaves just like biplane with both wings removed.
what if alternate wings got shot off? e.g. top right and bottom left blown off
- roger-wilco-66 - 03.12.2008
My understanding of the structure of biplane wings - or the whole structure of that kind of airplane design - is that the upper and lower wings support each other by wire and strut bracing (even the fuselage of the plane is internally stabilized by wire bracing) . If the bracing is shot, or a entire surface (wing) is destroyed, the whole mess folds together and is gone. Or in another view, you will have a huge increase in entropy in that aerodynamical system. Everything else is far fetched theory!
:lol:
Mark
- jeesus - 04.12.2008
roger-wilco-66 Wrote:My understanding of the structure of biplane wings - or the whole structure of that kind of airplane design - is that the upper and lower wings support each other by wire and strut bracing (even the fuselage of the plane is internally stabilized by wire bracing) . If the bracing is shot, or a entire surface (wing) is destroyed, the whole mess folds together and is gone. Or in another view, you will have a huge increase in entropy in that aerodynamical system. Everything else is far fetched theory!
:lol:
Mark
If lower wing is removed then upper wing falls off but removing upper wing doesnt detach lower wing.
- psychobob - 04.12.2008
LOL. Kind of like asking why a four wheeled automobile can't drive the same with two wheels removed.
- Monty27 - 04.12.2008
[quote=My wife saw me flying on IL-2 once. She said, "I'll never get into an airplane with you at the controls.[/quote]
I get that all the time too!
- jeesus - 04.12.2008
psychobob Wrote:LOL. Kind of like asking why a four wheeled automobile can't drive the same with two wheels removed.
No. Its more like asking why a four wheeled automobile with two wheels removed can't drive the same with all wheels removed. Do you think that when upper wings are removed lower wings lose lift and drag?
- Fusek - 04.12.2008
I swear i saw a j8 flying with one wing missing when it first came out!
-
P/O W. 'Moggy' Cattermole - 04.12.2008
On the subject of people refusing to get near an aircraft with me; my grandad said that when he saw me on MSFlightSim 98. What was eerily prophetic was that i had just intentionally flew a 737 into one of the world trade centre towers....
- Radoye - 04.12.2008
P/O W. 'Moggy' Cattermole Wrote:What was eerily prophetic was that i had just intentionally flew a 737 into one of the world trade centre towers....
A lot of us used to do that as a joke before 9/11. Since then things kinda changed so that joke lost its appeal...
-
P/O W. 'Moggy' Cattermole - 04.12.2008
I'd like to point out that i stopped doing things like that ages before 9/11; the idea of doing it post 9/11 would be sick.