Historical Accuracy vs Balanced Gameplay - Printable Version

+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Discussion Section 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=292)
+---- Thread: Historical Accuracy vs Balanced Gameplay (/showthread.php?tid=59419)

---

Historical Accuracy vs Balanced Gameplay - shakthamac - 16.02.2009

Just thought I'd get a feel for what the masses prefer.

---

- Bearcat - 16.02.2009

I prefer historical accuracy... and once you get outside the realm of history.. at least as best as possible hypotetical historic accuracy..

---

- Paulo Hirth - 16.02.2009

The better way to try hit the realistic FM is a tecnical vision: velocity, aceleration, wing area, engine power, weight, fisical aceleration, air resistense aerodinamic...
History from veteran is not the best way, because they dont flew both planes, politic pression to
say what was more politic "correct" and by simple passion too.
The pilot was very important to decide of victory or loose, this is clear in start and end of war

I dont believe in 4.09m anymore, i hope a discussion to a "Oficial FM AAA Patch", to try enchance the realism, YES WE CAN!

---