Panzer P1000 and P1500 - Printable Version
+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: Screen Shots, Images & Video (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=273)
+--- Forum: Screenshots, Images & Video (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=314)
+--- Thread: Panzer P1000 and P1500 (/showthread.php?tid=65221)
+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: Screen Shots, Images & Video (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=273)
+--- Forum: Screenshots, Images & Video (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=314)
+--- Thread: Panzer P1000 and P1500 (/showthread.php?tid=65221)
Panzer P1000 and P1500 - VonWaffen - 30.09.2009
This was project made by the krupp compagnie and could be deadly in a what if senario ....
I let you have a look by your self ... :twisted:
![[Image: p1000.jpg]](http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv40/vonwaffen/p1000.jpg)
![[Image: p1000rattebitwaircmu6.jpg]](http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv40/vonwaffen/p1000rattebitwaircmu6.jpg)
![[Image: latte19.jpg]](http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv40/vonwaffen/latte19.jpg)
![[Image: 034.jpg]](http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv40/vonwaffen/034.jpg)
![[Image: tank_compare_r.jpg]](http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv40/vonwaffen/tank_compare_r.jpg)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL0h19ci ... dded#t=153
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Myn8mRQb4qE
- caldrail - 30.09.2009
Too heavy. The Maus was smaller and that struggled. Bridges certainly couldn't support leviathans like that so there would be strategic disadvantages to employing massive armoured vehicles of this size, especially at a time when fuel was becoming scarce. An entertaining idea, but to all intents and purposes, science fiction.
- highlander_262 - 30.09.2009
As far as I remember these monsters were only meant as mobile coastal defence guns, not as tanks. Ground pressure would have been enormous leading to bogging down in even mildly soft terrain.
- TinyTim - 30.09.2009
highlander_262 Wrote:As far as I remember these monsters were only meant as mobile coastal defence guns, not as tanks. Ground pressure would have been enormous leading to bogging down in even mildly soft terrain.
Exactly. Sometimes people tend to forget that surface(s) rise with second, and mass rises with third power of dimension.
- ROSOBORONEXPORTCORP - 30.09.2009
It would be like a slow ship - an easy target.
- HH_Cipher - 30.09.2009
Reminds me of the WH40K Guard Baneblade...
Big beasts. Super Heavy's. Slow, Lumbering, and damn tough
- highlander_262 - 30.09.2009
God i used to play that many moons ago :roll:
- HH_Cipher - 30.09.2009
highlander_262 Wrote:God i used to play that many moons ago :roll:
I still do
- Dynamo11 - 30.09.2009
I hate these big massive "what if" German tanks... the Maus was not much bigger than (well sorta) than the Tiger II and it struggled due to how heavy it was.
It is why these were never put into production and why I hate them. I'm open to 1946 stuff but things that were unable to be made or put into use in even
1947/48 gets a -1 from me.
However mod wise I wouldn't d/l it but I' sure there is a large majority who would love this kind of thing!
- Guest - 30.09.2009
Dynamo11 Wrote:I hate these big massive "what if" German tanks... the Maus was not much bigger than (well sorta) than the Tiger II and it struggled due to how heavy it was.
It is why these were never put into production and why I hate them. I'm open to 1946 stuff but things that were unable to be made or put into use in even
1947/48 gets a -1 from me.
However mod wise I wouldn't d/l it but I' sure there is a large majority who would love this kind of thing!
Don't hate just cause you can't duplicate.