Russian and Japanese 262 - Guest - 10.11.2009
I think that we are missing some of the other types of me262, the russian and japanese mod versions of it.
Here is the basic information. You can go digging cos I gotta go right now...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-9_(1946)
http://tanks45.tripod.com/Jets45/Histor ... 9/Su-9.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_J9Y
http://www.century-of-flight.freeola.co ... 0Kikka.htm
There you go. It would add the first japanese jet if completed and further complete the collection of 262's we already have...
Enjoy :o
Re: Russian and Japanese 262 -
Uzin - 10.11.2009
germanluftwaffe606 Wrote:I think that we are missing some of the other types of me262, the russian and japanese mod versions of it.
Here is the basic information. You can go digging cos I gotta go right now...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-9_(1946)
Enjoy :o
This link concerns later Su-9, not similar to 262, but more to MiG-21. See the picture in that link.
- Eldur - 10.11.2009
Sukhoi Su-9 (1946)
But they're completely different planes... here's the real japanese 262:
Nakajima Ki-201
- Batbomb - 10.11.2009
I'm wirking on a skin for the Karyu but it will take a bit time.
- Radoye - 10.11.2009
These planes were all very different than the 262, both structurally and performance-wise, there's only a superficial similarity on the outside.
There was one direct copy of the 262, the Avia S-92 and CS-92 (two seat trainer version) which was built in small numbers post war. There were plans for mass-production for export but no orders materialized so the project died.
So, other than the Avia for which one can use the 262 as a base all of these would need to be built from scratch if one wish to make them properly.
- Batbomb - 10.11.2009
No Messerschidt and karyu are 90% identical in outside structure. Compare 2 Blueprints. Only some details on the motor and the rudders are a bit different. Messerschmidt and Kikka, can't be compared in that fact you are right, but Karyu and Messerschmidt have very simmilar performance and proportions.
- F22-Raptor-2006 - 10.11.2009
The SU-9 was deployed from 1959 onwards...... That's F4 Phantom II era....
- mmielli - 10.11.2009
F22-Raptor-2006 Wrote:The SU-9 was deployed from 1959 onwards...... That's F4 Phantom II era....
Maybe the other SU-9, SU-10 and SU-11:
Su-9 (1946)
This twin-engine jet fighter was conceptually similar to the German Me 262. The engines were copies of the Junkers Jumo 004. It was advised that the Su-9 would enter production, but Stalin rejected it because of its similarity to the Me 262.
Function: fighter
Year: 1946 Crew: 1 Engines: 2 * 900kg RD-10
Wing Span: 11.21m Length: 10.57m Height: 3.72m Wing Area: 20.24m2
Empty Weight: 4060kg Max.Weight: 6380kg
Speed: 900km/h Ceiling: Range: 1140km
Armament: 1*g37mm 2*g23mm 500kg
http://www.the-blueprints.com/blueprint ... khoi_su-9/
SU-11 (1947)
This was a development of the first Su-9. It retained its similarity to the Me 262, that caused Stalin to reject it. However, the Su-11 was the first Soviet jet fighter powered by indigenous engines. One built.
Function: fighter
Year: 1947 Crew: 1 Engines: 2 * 1300kg Lyulka TR-1
Wing Span: 11.80m Length: 10.57m Height: 3.72m Wing Area: 21.40m2
Empty Weight: 4495kg Max.Weight:
Speed: 940km/h Ceiling: Range: 910km
Armament: 1*g37mm 2*g23mm 500kg
http://www.the-blueprints.com/blueprint ... hoi_su-11/
SU-13 (1947)
http://www.the-blueprints.com/blueprint ... hoi_su-13/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-9_(1946)
- Radoye - 10.11.2009
Batbomb Wrote:No Messerschidt and karyu are 90% identical in outside structure. Compare 2 Blueprints. Only some details on the motor and the rudders are a bit different. Messerschmidt and Kikka, can't be compared in that fact you are right, but Karyu and Messerschmidt have very simmilar performance and proportions.
No they're not identical, far from it. :roll:
Ki-201 Karyu vs Me 262:
Length: 11.48m vs 10.60m
Wingspan: 13.68m vs 12.50m
Height: 3.96m vs 3.80m
Wing Area: 25.00m2 vs 21.80m2
Takeoff Weight: 5760kg vs 6404kg
Speed: 851km/h vs 855km/h
Range: 978km vs 1040km
Ceiling: 12000m vs 11000m
Rate of Climb: 774 m/min vs 1200m/min
The similarities are only superficial, these are completely different planes.
- Guest - 11.11.2009
ok wether they are like the 262 or not these planes would be a good addition especialy the japanese one because then the japanese would have their first jet. :-?
- Guest - 11.11.2009
ok wether they are like the 262 or not these planes would be a good addition especialy the japanese one because then the japanese would have their first jet. :-?