[REQUEST] Swiss K+W C-36 - Printable Version

+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Discussion Section 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=292)
+---- Thread: [REQUEST] Swiss K+W C-36 (/showthread.php?tid=66900)

---

[REQUEST] Swiss K+W C-36 - CHSubZero - 04.12.2009

Could someone make a mod with this plane?
The "K+W C-36" or "EKW C36" was a plane similiar to the IL-2 but with a twin fin layout.

Bilder





External Links
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eidgen%C3%B6ssische_Konstruktionswerkst%C3%A4tte_K%2BW_C-36
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EKW_C36
http://www.eusebio.ch/C36_t.htm

---

- Bobbo - 04.12.2009

Kind of look like the love child of a Bf-110, Il-2 and Spitfire, doesn't it?

---

- man139 - 04.12.2009

+1

Would be a great addition, becouse there aren't any planes from Switserland in the game

---

- NineToes - 04.12.2009

+1

...right after we get the IK-3

---

- crochebo - 04.12.2009

+10!

Woot very nice one :oops:

---

- norm - 04.12.2009

did it see combat?

---

- man139 - 04.12.2009

norm Wrote:did it see combat?

it said on wikipedia, that it was used to bounce Luftwaffe fighters out of the Swiss sky, so i guess it did see combat :lol:

---

- norm - 04.12.2009

man139 Wrote:

norm Wrote:did it see combat?

it said on wikipedia, that it was used to bounce Luftwaffe fighters out of the Swiss sky, so i guess it did see combat :lol:

Sorry, i didn't see the links?

---

- riffraffv8 - 05.12.2009

Deadly



respect

riffraff

---

- man139 - 05.12.2009

norm Wrote:

man139 Wrote:

norm Wrote:did it see combat?

it said on wikipedia, that it was used to bounce Luftwaffe fighters out of the Swiss sky, so i guess it did see combat :lol:

Sorry, i didn't see the links?

no problem

---

- European Snake - 05.12.2009

I think a 110 committed a sin with an ME-109 lol

---

- Chaoic16 - 05.12.2009

European Snake Wrote:I think a 110 committed a sin with an ME-109 lol

Haha good one, that must explain why this aircraft look like a hybrid of Bf 109 and BF 110...

:lol:

However, I have never seen this aircraft before and this is very interesting aircraft!


Chaoic out...

---

- CHSubZero - 08.12.2009

I'm still looking for a three view diagramm so that a plane modeller can "draw" this aircraft.
Meanwhile I found a interesting description of this airplane on Crazy planes.
The linked site discribes the engineering from the prototype C-3600 to the WW2 airplane C-3603 (pics in this thread above) and finally to the last version C-3605 (used until 1987):

Here is an extract of the important facts:

Quote:The design of this Swiss aircraft goes back to 1939 when the prototype two seater EKW C-3601 first flew. Fitted with twin fins, the aircraft was powered by a 1000 hp Hispano-Suiza HS-51 12Y piston engine, and was designed for multi purpose roles - including that of fighter, ground attack and light bomber.
...
The all metal design was put into production by the Federal Eidg. KonstruktionsWerkstatte (EKW) aircraft factory at Thun as the C-3603, and was one of the first home designs put into large scale production for the Swiss Air Force. The aircraft was fitted with two machine guns in the wings, plus a rearward facing one operated by hand by the second crew member/observer. Over 150 were delivered to the Swiss Air Force from 1942, being used to patrol Switzerland's neutral air space (along with Swiss Messerschmitt Bf-109's), with six squadrons being equipped during World War Two, the C-3603's served until 1952 when they were replaced by DH Vampire jet fighters.
...

Here is only a two view diagramm from the C-3603:
http://wp.scn.ru/en/ww2/a/142/121/0/4

I also found on airliners.net a picture of the cockpit of a C-3603:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/EKW-C-3603/0431339/L/

Maybe I find a better Three view diagramm instead this on from http://aircombat.modelarji.com/viewtopic.php?t=387:

---