bomb rack in FW-190 A7/A8/A9 - Printable Version

+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: IL2 MODS Download & Discussion (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=267)
+--- Forum: IL-2 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=348)
+---- Forum: IL2 MODS Discussion Section 4.09m (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=292)
+---- Thread: bomb rack in FW-190 A7/A8/A9 (/showthread.php?tid=67463)

---

bomb rack in FW-190 A7/A8/A9 - Guest - 26.12.2009

even when you select DEFAULT, in the FW's190 the series A7 A8 A9.
appears that support for bombs.
it is possible to remove it ?

As you can see in the picture.
this is a rare example of FW-190 A8, and not have that support for bombs.

---

- F22-Raptor-2006 - 26.12.2009

Its part of the external model which is also mapped on the skin so its quite hard to remove and would mean quite a lot of work. I had a check to see if it was something I could just change in the class file but turns out it isn't. :S

---

- Zorin - 26.12.2009

That would be historically incorrect.

All 190s after the A6 came with the racks as standard fit and they were not removed in the field.

The example you show is, most likely, a Flugwerk new-build, which of course comes without them, as there is no point in having them.

---

- Guest - 26.12.2009

Zorin Wrote:The example you show is, most likely, a Flugwerk new-build, which of course comes without them, as there is no point in having them.

Zorin beat me to it, but yeah, thats looking alot look FlugWerks A-8.

---

- jak24610 - 26.12.2009

Look at bottom photo, in middle of two landing flaps, bomb rack.

---

- Guest - 27.12.2009

jak24610 Wrote:Look at bottom photo, in middle of two landing flaps, bomb rack.

but is much smaller than that.

---

- [KO]FlyMaker - 27.12.2009

This apparatus is very ugly. And FW lost very extensive performance.

---

- Guest - 27.12.2009

[KO]FlyMaker Wrote:This apparatus is very ugly. And FW lost very extensive performance.

Certainly, very ugly
why a pure fighter would have to carry it?

---

- [KO]FlyMaker - 27.12.2009

I totally agree!
The FW is a beautiful airplane and can not stay with one of these horrible thing!

---

- Karaya - 27.12.2009

The bombrack is a purely cosmetic part of the FW190A8's 3D model, it does NOT have any impact on the aircrafts performance...

---

- Guest - 27.12.2009

Karaya Wrote:The bombrack is a purely cosmetic part of the FW190A8's 3D model, it does NOT have any impact on the aircrafts performance...

but aesthetically, it will be better.

---

- akdavis - 27.12.2009

=BLW=PabloSniper Wrote:

[KO]FlyMaker Wrote:This apparatus is very ugly. And FW lost very extensive performance.

Certainly, very ugly
why a pure fighter would have to carry it?

For a droptank. I only recall seeing one pic of an operational A-8 without the ETC 501.

---

- Zorin - 27.12.2009

Ok, now wait a second here. Modding is not about pleasing anyones aesthetic preferences!

The planes were all delivered with racks for a purpose. They usually operated with the need for a droptank or to be used as fighter bombers.

There is absolutely no point in discussing the removal of any historical accurate parts on any plane. Period.

---

- Guest - 27.12.2009

Zorin Wrote:Ok, now wait a second here. Modding is not about pleasing anyones aesthetic preferences!

The planes were all delivered with racks for a purpose. They usually operated with the need for a droptank or to be used as fighter bombers.

There is absolutely no point in discussing the removal of any historical accurate parts on any plane. Period.

and now?
this is also a FlugWerks?
I think not.

---

- Guest - 28.12.2009

And it's also missing the two inside wing cannons if you look closely....

---