Italian Chronometer Issues - Printable Version

+- All-Aircraft-Simulations (https://allaircraftsimulations.com)
+-- Forum: Help Desk (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=270)
+--- Forum: IL2 Technical Help (https://allaircraftsimulations.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=304)
+--- Thread: Italian Chronometer Issues (/showthread.php?tid=72743)

---

Italian Chronometer Issues - Rudoji - 20.01.2011

I upgraded to 4.10m the morning it came out (great Christmas present btw XP), and just now I noticed something out of place about the Macchi planes...

http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/6777/mvc010fa.jpg

Now I don't remember this chronometer being all... WTF'd O_O

The Re.2000's and SM.79's are just fine, but the 200's, 202's and 205's are all goof-balled like that.

Because the chronometer's a very prominent part of the cockpit of my sweet Veltro, is there any way to fix this?

---

Re: Italian Chronometer Issues - Heinkel-162 - 20.01.2011

So you are saying that the clock wasn't there before upgrading to 4.10m?

Are you sure it isn't historical, have you checked any references?

---

Re: Italian Chronometer Issues - Planemad - 21.01.2011

I think it does go there.

SoW / CoD Macchi 202 cockpit?


Planemad

---

Re: Italian Chronometer Issues - Rudoji - 21.01.2011

Heinkel-162 Wrote:So you are saying that the clock wasn't there before upgrading to 4.10m?

Are you sure it isn't historical, have you checked any references?

It's just... are the hands supposed to look all unaligned like they are in my picture? Because none of the other Italian ones are like that; the hands all sit in the center and this one happens to be all cuckoo.

If this is how they are supposed to be, I'll discontinue this thread (really wish I'd remember how they looked originally).

---

Re: Italian Chronometer Issues - Heinkel-162 - 21.01.2011

If that picture you posted is the Mc-200, then the cockpit itself is quite incorrect!

---

Re: Italian Chronometer Issues - Rudoji - 21.01.2011

Heinkel-162 Wrote:If that picture you posted is the Mc-200, then the cockpit itself is quite incorrect!

Actually it's a 205, but it's still incorrect in respect of a few things. Nice clear image you found there :3

---