[RedChico]

One of the planes was a Fw 190 A6 with modified wings, so its the good old same engine.


PS: don't feel forced to model it.

PS2: about the XP-71, as i said i post it in the thread through a link of chaos so i didn't read his 1st post, so, never mind (until someone finds good info, cause i can't).

[Chaoic16]

@caldrail

Not impossible at all, there are programs that do flight analisys, i.e. Catia, from Dassault Systems.
Maybe i can get enough acess to it for a study of those wings, and use my average knowledge on aerodymanics (I was in a aerospace uni course but i quit).

But if you don't have a performance analysis of the motor then its still useless.


Don't get me wrong. The more planes the better, but these planes are just not worth the time in my opinion. This is one of those things were quanity isn't better than quality.

You can do every aerodynamic test on those models but they will never be correct if you do not have info for the location of the fuel, quanitity of the fuel, oil location and quanity, ammo count and location and any motor related parts. The P47's supercharger is behind the pilot in the mid section, not a common place for it. So you can't really guess about things that like. Those all come together and make up the aircraft's "feel."

Before i make a change i check all my sources for conflicting info. If i cannot find a piece of info about a certain performance feature then it is scrapped and i DO NOT guess. If you cannot find ANY TESTED information on a plane, then it to should be scrapped.

Chaotic's List would be much much shorter if you eliminated each aircraft that had a lack of performance figures....

Thirdeye... NOTHING I mean NOTHING is impossible ever.. And seconldy, like I said, it never hurt to be at least open minded on any problems. I am still waiting for my free time to write my theories on how we can get best 'predicted' FM. And no it wil never be perfectly realism like real life plane but again, it would give us the best results we can get.

And finally, you gotta to be more flexible on 1946s and 'what if', we already have been having many simulators that only have traditional historical planes. It is never our waste of time to include 'what if' planes that were not built. Its something people who are flexible with these would alway 'wonder what would it be like to fly these in WWII' because its so fun and is great thing to experience that in Il-2 1946 like no other simulator.


Chaoic out...