[Kristorf]

Cheers mate, looks greaty in game

[Dudok22]

My FPS dont decreased and I think that I have more fps when I flying near clouds but I must do more testing

[Veltro]

BASE_R_DISP 3.5, great FPS in blind.

[Kristorf]

[Veltro]

I'm still testing BASE_R_DISP 3.5, but it's a dream guys.....

[Rus_Andrey]

[Guest]

Interesting but "hazy" seems to be harder for FPS than "poor" or "blind"!?

[PA_Willy]

Which is according to you the recommend value then?

I have only tested 2.5

Thanks in advance.

[Guest]

I have it at 3.0 now. Clouds are little bigger and it didn't affect fps, I have tried 7.0 it is really towering fronts, but game won't run.

This is with third layer of clouds; also don't works, beside its ugly. Independence Day mother ship

[canonuk]

Big, big fan of this mod! Outstanding work - thanks so much :)

[Veltro]

3.0 is good, but 3.5 is looking more "realistic" and really amazing. I don't know online, i need to test it.

[Seimiev]

Better than words, a few screens with different BASE_R_DISP values.
The NGHBR_ABSRB is set to 0.80 for all.

Clouds alt.= 2500, plane alt.= 5000.
Weather is set on Blind except for the last 2 screens (weather=Poor)


BASE_R_DISP 2.5


BASE_R_DISP 3


BASE_R_DISP 3.5


BASE_R_DISP 3.5 alternate view


BASE_R_DISP 4


BASE_R_DISP 4 alternate view


BASE_R_DISP 5


BASE_R_DISP 5 alternate view


BASE_R_DISP 3.5 (Weather=Poor)


BASE_R_DISP 3.5 alternate view (weather=Poor)

[Veltro]

BASE_R_DISP 5.0.... hock: ...good FPS. IL2 is not an old engine i think......
This file DATA.cld is fantastic! Now i think that 3.5 is the minimun value for a good sky.

[Bee]

A few more...

[panzerkeil]

I think the clouds would look even better if the textures in clouds4x4.tga would be wider instead of the round clouds we have now. I tried to do this but I am not very experienced with paintshop..