[mmielli]

Two, very obvious questions....

1) ...Why...?

2) Is this there any historical proof?

I dont mean to sound rude, mearly perplexed...?

1) It would be more realistic than a Lerche.

2)

Well the lerche is just silly, but you have a point. Forgive me, I had no idea such a varient even existed. Well you learn something new everyday.

So I have but no alternative but to say +1 (the quad engined version actually looks rather nice).

The Messerschmitt Me P.1101 is more real to the Ta-183, look this:
http://www.luft46.com/mess/mep1101.html ... 0prototype

[GentleKiller]

if we can create new planes, then a BIG BUMP FOR THESE JETS!

[F22-Raptor-2006]

there's also this -



ju 287 4-6 jet engine bomber, forward swept wing, 2x20mm in a tail turret and proposed payload of 4000kg.

I still prefer the usual 4 engine Arado under the wings than these. They look , a little ugly with all those engines everywhere :?

...I am working on that one.

Slow if you are making one that's cool!! maybe take the he162D wings and stretch/enlarge them with the ar234 fuesalage? Then just place some engines around where they should be.

[mmielli]

This video on youtube whit AAA - BF109T, and , wolll!!! his have, in the end, one Arado 234C , whit four engines, please any new about that?????

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg641_9mTas

[Phas3e]

What about going the other way and having the early landing skid version?

[Hellzone]

That might be possiable.

[mmielli]

Some versions this plane and some links: :twisted:

http://www.airpages.ru/cgi-bin/epg.pl?n ... age=ar234c

http://www.vectorsite.net/avar234.html

http://www.xs4all.nl/~fbonne/warbirds/w ... 234verstab

http://modelingmadness.com/reviews/axis/luft/cai234.htm

http://tanks45.tripod.com/Jets45/Histor ... /Ar234.htm

http://anonymous-generaltopics.blogspot ... blitz.html

http://books.google.com.br/books?id=bb1 ... lt#PPP1,M1

And some new idae (night fighter): :twisted:

http://us.st12.yimg.com/us.st.yimg.com/ ... _136089892

http://www.netmerchants.co.uk/product.p ... nachtigall

http://www.netmerchants.co.uk/product.p ... nachtigall

:wink: :wink: :wink: !

[ColaBen]

Hi'
Spending energy on a 4 eng AR 234 is right silly, only 10-12 were ever build only a few of them flew :roll:
Hals und Beinbruch
ColaBen

[Slow]

Hi'
Spending energy on a 4 eng AR 234 is right silly, only 10-12 were ever build only a few of them flew :roll:
Hals und Beinbruch
ColaBen

Please do not dictate what Hellzone has to make.

[Brophmeister]

Hi'
Spending energy on a 4 eng AR 234 is right silly, only 10-12 were ever build only a few of them flew :roll:
Hals und Beinbruch
ColaBen

So? They still flew! Youre calling something that really existed "downright silly" when we have a Lerche? I could talk about some other mods which seem "downright silly" when put in perspective, but people want them and modders want to make them, so leave them alone.

[Widowmaker]

If I recall.. Hellzone is already working on one. I think I saw a teezer at the end of one of his 109T videos that showed a 4 engine version of the 234 taking off from a carrier lol.

[Hellzone]

Hi'
Spending energy on a 4 eng AR 234 is right silly, only 10-12 were ever build only a few of them flew :roll:
Hals und Beinbruch
ColaBen

Please do not dictate what Hellzone has to make.

your right..

and yes it took off from the carrier, Has so much thrust it gets off the carrier with out a problem... Of course i have to make thos enginens less powerfull

[vampire_pilot]

actually why make them less powerfull?

these where 4 BMW003, they have a certain amount of thrust, which is only a little below the Jumo (if i recall correctly) Wouldn't it be more realistic to increase the weight to the figures of the real C4 variant (pressurized cockpit)?

[JV69_BADA]

bmw003 = TRD-Rd20 engine (mig9) and have correct specs! :wink:

[rurikvan]

Just waiting for it, it make me incredible happy when i see it