14.09.2008, 14:40
Slow Wrote:I just don't know how to do it :wink:LBR=Rademacher Wrote:magot Wrote:@LBR=Rademacher
great job dude,but dont worry with high quality,I can help you after finished LOD0 with de-crease polys in individual parts,no problemo.
Try making external pit,(turrets),complete gears without animation,cut plane to individual parts LOD0,and you must addind CAPs.You will be need visible destroyed part as bend propeler + animate.After finished LOD0 and UVW mapping I can help you with lods,collisions and hooks,hierarchy and names files ... but will be hard work,believ me
regards,
magot
Yeah, the LOD stuff and the CAPs are the smallest problem, i guess. I've been reading the Il-2 Moddling thread and it sens simple, time consuming but simple.
One thing i don't have a clue on how to proceed is the transparent parts, the animations and the UVW mappings. I've never done anything like that, someone will have to walk me through it.
Transparent parts are alpha channels in the skins.
Edit: I've checked some info that madcat PMed me and i got a few questions. Perhaps someone could help me.
Judging for the pictures the Me264 had a V shaped tail section (like the on in the He162), but the drawings i've seen are inconclusive since some show a straight one and others the V-shaped version. This is more confusing since there's no way to operate a single piece elevator in a V-shaped tail and all the drawings show that it is single pieced rather than two separate elevators.
The other question is: This landing gear configuration with the Wing gears folding laterally to fit into the engine/wing is absurdly complex and i had some hard time modeling it. But i came across one drawing that showed the same configuration as in the Ju188, with the gear folding backwards to fir inside the larger BMW801E engine (the first gear configuration was designed when they used the smaller Jumo engine). I believe that they had not enough time to change the gear after changing the engine configuration, but that the production version (A-0 or A-1) would have the same configuration as the Ju188. Should i go for the Ju188 style gear or keep it like it is?