21.11.2009, 03:36
Well i have to admit some things:
Ultrapack 109 G6/AS RL is currently the same engine model of kurfurst link, DB605-ASM with ata 1.3 and MW50. so this engine is the one i have selected at kurfurst. So i was right comparing this engine at kurfurst with it.
Oleg G6/AS modelled a DB605/ASM too, but with unblocked ATA 1.42 engine, so, the FM already used in Muas G6/AS RL, is not the same, because is blocked at ATA 1.3, so, it can be perfectly compared with kurfurst test of DB605-ASM (just having in mind that oleg's engine is unblocked at ATA 1.42)
Unified Installer's Muas G6/AS New Slot, modeled by Karaya has correct NO MW-50, and yes, it could be compared with the test of a DB605-AS engine, not ASM, with no MW50, so that is my fault having compared it in the same chart.
Ultrapack 109 G6/AS RL is currently the same engine model of kurfurst link, DB605-ASM with ata 1.3 and MW50. so this engine is the one i have selected at kurfurst. So i was right comparing this engine at kurfurst with it.
Oleg G6/AS modelled a DB605/ASM too, but with unblocked ATA 1.42 engine, so, the FM already used in Muas G6/AS RL, is not the same, because is blocked at ATA 1.3, so, it can be perfectly compared with kurfurst test of DB605-ASM (just having in mind that oleg's engine is unblocked at ATA 1.42)
Unified Installer's Muas G6/AS New Slot, modeled by Karaya has correct NO MW-50, and yes, it could be compared with the test of a DB605-AS engine, not ASM, with no MW50, so that is my fault having compared it in the same chart.