06.12.2009, 11:50
Freddy Wrote:The modified things are in the next update ....The modified things?
Freddy Wrote:I ve said to you to wait for the next update and to make your test again ....Not that it maters, In that I don't need anyones permission to test anything. But I didn't see your post where you admitted there is a problem with the ROC until after I posted those results. That and the purpose of this test was two fold, One to show there is a bug in the ROC and two to see how well the 'real fly' test results matches the IL2Comp results.
That is to say you said awhile back that you think the IL2Comp graphs are wrong, in that you 'think' IL2Comp is not taking into account your Java changes. That is to say you 'thought' the 10,000fpm ROC that IL2Comp reported is not valid. But, as you can see from my 'real fly' testing agrees with the IL2Comp results, thus, it appears IL2Comp 'is' taking into account your Java changes.
Freddy Wrote:This next update is coming probably this week but it s a very large project and to prevent from any bug it takes a lot of time ...I understand, I am just glad I was able to help by pointing out the ROC bug, that you are now going to address in your next update!
Freddy Wrote:I ve made a lot of changes to make these planes very close to the real ...Well, I have heard that before! Thus only time will tell!
At least now we know the IL2Comp results will be close to the 'real fly' results, thus providing quick 'ball park' feedback on how well the plane is simulated.Freddy Wrote:I ll post the list of these changes when the update will be availableCool, looking forward to it!