[ACE-OF-ACES]

I dont want to talk with a mental guy , I ve better things to do ....

But I can t let stupidities been written here without answer ....

At last I really think you have not your place in this thread ...

And to prove you are just telling stupidities , I ask to people to do a simple test ...Your curves say my F-86 have better roc , speed , etc , than a real F-86 and than the default hsfx F-86 ?..
Your curves are wrong !... And to see it , all you have to do is to hit fly in the simulator with every F-86 and Corea mod 1.3 On/off ...You ll immediatly see that the default F-86 is like an ufo with a F16 FM , and all is tuned down in my F-86 ...It s exactly the opposite that your curves say ! :lol: ... And tested with some real fighter pilots help ...

Perhaps now you can go far from here ? ( visit to a doctor .... ? )

Bye bye

I can understand the reason you feel the need to attack me

In that you are one of those guys that can not take construtive critisism

Even though you were the one that asked people to test your mod to see which one they think is more realistic

I guess you never thought anyone would do as detailed of a job as I did

As for your Java class excuse

You are NOW trying to say was not in place back in HISTOMOD 1.1

And that is the cause of the large ROC error IL2Comp is showing in HISTOMOD 1.3

Even though you used that same Java excuse back during the HISTOMOD 1.1 testing

That showed the ROC was off by 35% at SL

So the question still stands

Are you lying now or were you lying than?

As for your 'simple' test discribed above

Thanks but no thanks

I prefer my 'detailed' testing

In that it is this type of 'detailed' testing that uncovers the arcade types of FMs your F86A has

Where as 'simple' testing is for lemming that want to belive