07.11.2007, 12:40
Lo0n Wrote:edit two loons eh, damn that split personality
LOL, I see. There is a small difference, but anyway curious coincidence making this world smaller than it looks to be :wink:
Lo0n Wrote:edit two loons eh, damn that split personality
Sojka Wrote:Even when clear mistakes are in the files such as incorrect wingspan and wingarea for Spitfire and Ta-152C? I have seen the EM and FM data that were extracted by other people.Aymar_Mauri Wrote:So, the same religious dogmas apply here at AAA?yeh, and i hope it will stay this way..
Daiichidoku Wrote:id love to see many 'mistakes' corrected, and other thigns happen tooAll true.
p38: fix compress, and apply to ALL otehr types in game, or remove it from p38
jets: just as they upgrading engine powere "with absolutely no time to spare" with yak1B up power
for go 229, it certaily would have recieved uprated jumos, or went to better bmws or hirths
+11 temepst, the most produced type
the list goes on
Daiichidoku Wrote:but as far as that sutff goes, i want that from oleg, nobody elseGuess what? You're not going to get it from him. Oleg is only interested in online gameplay balance, therefore the constant changes in the data due to the online whiners. And I'm not going to mention his never shown "historical sources".
Daiichidoku Wrote:its wrong to change/play with that stuffCare to explain why? And please don't mention the online cheating. With the sheer amount of experience and knowledge about airplane performance of most veteran pilots online, cheaters can be easily caught.
the avenmger was played with, but that a COG/model placement issue, the FM itself was not altered...cases like this i can accept
even if we only found out about the 300kg underweight of LaGGs now, and could easily change the weight to correct values, i WOULDNT want it from mod...i would rather fly 600lbs underweight over-performing LaGG, or fight them, than have a correct mass LaGG from a mod
Daiichidoku Wrote:isounds, skinds, maps, flyables, reticles, all that good stuff..FU olegWhat you are explaining here is that online balance trumps historical accuracy and that, from my experience reading many forums, is precisely the only thing many of the online players ever wanted. They never actually cared about IL-2 data and performance being up to par with historical data. They just want to be sure their plane is as best as it can be and the enemy's is as wost as it can be.
FMs/DMs and that kinda stuff? FU whoever does it
Skunkmeister Wrote:Modifying sounds, map textures, default skins, adding new flyables = extending life of Il2.
Modifying FM's and DM's = death of Il2.
Aymar_Mauri Wrote:Sojka Wrote:Even when clear mistakes are in the files such as incorrect wingspan and wingarea for Spitfire and Ta-152C? I have seen the EM and FM data that were extracted by other people.Aymar_Mauri Wrote:So, the same religious dogmas apply here at AAA?yeh, and i hope it will stay this way..
AAA_Raptor Wrote:well if u ever did want oleg to do something about it contact them since they registered a few days ago with this forum!!!!!!!!! Perhaps u may change oleg's mind hopefully anyway.hehe that will be some funny person.. not Oleg..
ROSOBORONEXPORTCORP Wrote:The exception is, of course, the X-4. The loadout for the Ta-183 is almost certainly unrealistic. The Ar-234 would be a more likely platform. Of course the X-4 was never deployed in combat so perhaps the Arado, which was deployed in combat, should be left alone.