22.04.2008, 04:33
Trooper117 Wrote:GentleKiller Wrote:i want the fw190 d11 and 13
Is that you asking for new aircraft again?? hock:
Are you getting my drift ?
is that high plain drift, partner? :mrgreen:
Trooper117 Wrote:GentleKiller Wrote:i want the fw190 d11 and 13
Is that you asking for new aircraft again?? hock:
Are you getting my drift ?
vanir Wrote:I suspect Ranwers knows where the rabbit is kept in the magic trick :!:No, it's Ju-87C-1 - the B-2/CarrierModification
K-14 is usable, but I think its actual service history would have been muted by the Ta-152C which it would have served beside, been made obsolete by and probably withdrawn against.
It's a great plane for interest sake, but I'd love to see a production variant Ta-152C-1, C-2 and C-3 versions in the game (variant selected by armament option), featuring the DB-603L engine with the intercoolers (the il2 model is the less reliable 603LA of the C-0). I'd guess they'll go in the wings like Messerschmitt radiators.
With the reliability issue of the Ta-152C fixed the Axis finally has a high performance late-war/post-war fighter type every bit the equal of anything in the Allied arsenal. I mean the C-0 unserviceability just kills it against say, the P-47D (150-octane).
In a 1946 campaign for example, why is German industry still handicapped by production quality, assuming the industrial/war machine is in a totally different state?
The HGII Me-262 and Go-229 should also be re-modelled for reliability similar to the MiG-9, since similar manufacturing processes would have been used as the post-war Russian remanufacture of the Jumo/BMW jet engines.
Just some thoughts. Hope we get an Me-109T as well. I want to give Germany an aircraft carrier. Is the carrier version of the Ju-87C also called the Ju-87T?
vanir Wrote:I suspect Ranwers knows where the rabbit is kept in the magic trick :!:No, it's Ju-87C-1 - the B-2/CarrierModification
K-14 is usable, but I think its actual service history would have been muted by the Ta-152C which it would have served beside, been made obsolete by and probably withdrawn against.
It's a great plane for interest sake, but I'd love to see a production variant Ta-152C-1, C-2 and C-3 versions in the game (variant selected by armament option), featuring the DB-603L engine with the intercoolers (the il2 model is the less reliable 603LA of the C-0). I'd guess they'll go in the wings like Messerschmitt radiators.
With the reliability issue of the Ta-152C fixed the Axis finally has a high performance late-war/post-war fighter type every bit the equal of anything in the Allied arsenal. I mean the C-0 unserviceability just kills it against say, the P-47D (150-octane).
In a 1946 campaign for example, why is German industry still handicapped by production quality, assuming the industrial/war machine is in a totally different state?
The HGII Me-262 and Go-229 should also be re-modelled for reliability similar to the MiG-9, since similar manufacturing processes would have been used as the post-war Russian remanufacture of the Jumo/BMW jet engines.
Just some thoughts. Hope we get an Me-109T as well. I want to give Germany an aircraft carrier. Is the carrier version of the Ju-87C also called the Ju-87T?
Elvenking Wrote:
RAF_Magpie Wrote:I wouldnt say that - I believe its in the "In-Tray" in the "To-Do" list on Slow's desk. She'll get there. I have faith But the poor fellow's buried himself in work.
Elvenking Wrote:But is this so big problem? It differs from K-4 only with 2 stage supercharger, wing cannons and 4 blade propeller... If I had some modding abilities I would do it, but I'm totally unexperienced in this subject
RAF_Magpie Wrote:Because they have no idea of whats required to be blatently honest. No matter how many times its told to them... :roll:
Dont stress Slow, you have more supporters than nagger's mate.
Also, if anyones working on this lemme know now, because I know someone who is already working on this... But no more details from there. It may come, it may not.
What most people don't realise is the extraordinary amount of work required simply to make the SLIGHTEST change. Nevermind the difficulties that even those core modders, working as a team, still have with some things.
I repeat my previous word;
PATIENCE
Mag's