29.05.2010, 15:20
Blasph-Mossquitty Wrote:Does anyone agree with me about the F-82 Twin Mustang?
Someone got one nearly finished. There's a youtube video. Go ask him about it, because I'd love to see it.
Blasph-Mossquitty Wrote:Does anyone agree with me about the F-82 Twin Mustang?
328th*Col.Doodle Wrote:The thing is of the P-47M/N Thunderbolt is that paddel props. Made the airplane more faster and also you have a 3000 horsepower engine so speed is the key with this Thunderbolt. Other thing is that this model here was equipped with eight M3 Browning .50 caliber machine guns so we'll have more firepower.
{HVY-E}Jinxx Wrote:328th*Col.Doodle Wrote:The thing is of the P-47M/N Thunderbolt is that paddel props. Made the airplane more faster and also you have a 3000 horsepower engine so speed is the key with this Thunderbolt. Other thing is that this model here was equipped with eight M3 Browning .50 caliber machine guns so we'll have more firepower.
Doodle,
Hate to tell you, but you need to brush up on your history. Republic introduced the first Paddle Props on the P47C models. All versions of the P47 had 8 .50's
S!
Blasph-Mossquitty Wrote:There seems to be a glitch where I can't turn on the supercharger. I programmed the keys to turn it on in the control section (+[numpad] and Enter [numpad]) I also can't control propellor pitch in the campaigns.
Yes, we Definitely need new P-47s, and their performance needs an update as well. They are not as tough as they were historically [two cannon shells behind the canopy severs the tail, SO unrealistic] and their performance is the same at all altitudes! [they could turn with a 109 above 3,000 meters] These are a must-fix!
More corsair! The F4U-4 [as you guys have already mentioned] is a must, as well as the F2G-1 and -1C, which were equipped with bubble canopies and the fearsome R-4360 3,000 HP engine, and a 4-blade prop.
http://www.museumofflight.org/aircraft/ ... er-corsair
cpwn Wrote:BillSwagger Wrote:It would be cool to make a new slot D-23 and actually not very difficult considering the external 3d work is identical to the D-22. The flight characteristics of the D-22 were not all that far off from the D-23. I think all that distinguished them was the factories they were built at.
Bill
I think the D-10&22 in game which use the early Curtiss paddle blade propeller. It should be a little better than D-27 if equipped with hamilton or late Curtiss products.
poncho Wrote:My 2 cents on the turbocharger: to get user control of this there would have to be an alteration of the FM. In the original FM I think it was decided to factor in the performance effects of a supercharger without giving user control. I am not in on any of the new slot P47 development so I don't know if this is being addressed. I would like to see this in full real mode also for those who are interested in more complete engine management. For accuracy, there would have to be a the possibility of damage due to over-rpm and over heating.
FA_Diablo Wrote:Also...I think all of teh 50's were M-2 model and not M-3
{HVY-E}Jinxx Wrote:poncho Wrote:My 2 cents on the turbocharger: to get user control of this there would have to be an alteration of the FM. In the original FM I think it was decided to factor in the performance effects of a supercharger without giving user control. I am not in on any of the new slot P47 development so I don't know if this is being addressed. I would like to see this in full real mode also for those who are interested in more complete engine management. For accuracy, there would have to be a the possibility of damage due to over-rpm and over heating.
Poncho,
Would love to see this in full real also, but I don't think it will happen. You'd have to have a way to control the turbo waste gate at different power settings. I'm not even sure if P47 pilots had to worry about this. I seem to remember reading something about it being automatic. Just the S/C, Water Injection, Mixture and Throttle were controlled by the pilot. Will check my reference materials again and let you know for sure.
S!
{HVY-E}Jinxx Wrote:FA_Diablo Wrote:Also...I think all of teh 50's were M-2 model and not M-3
M2 is the ground variant like we use on vehicles or in a tripod.
M3 is the electrically actuated variant. Typically used in remote fire systems, a/c etc. There are different versions of this depending on application.
S!
FA_Diablo Wrote:{HVY-E}Jinxx Wrote:FA_Diablo Wrote:Also...I think all of teh 50's were M-2 model and not M-3
M2 is the ground variant like we use on vehicles or in a tripod.
M3 is the electrically actuated variant. Typically used in remote fire systems, a/c etc. There are different versions of this depending on application.
S!
Jinxx I thought teh M2 version was used during WW2 and teh M3 was developed as an improvement after teh war. It seems i remember teh m3 having a higher rate of fire than teh M2.
poncho Wrote:{HVY-E}Jinxx Wrote:poncho Wrote:My 2 cents on the turbocharger: to get user control of this there would have to be an alteration of the FM. In the original FM I think it was decided to factor in the performance effects of a supercharger without giving user control. I am not in on any of the new slot P47 development so I don't know if this is being addressed. I would like to see this in full real mode also for those who are interested in more complete engine management. For accuracy, there would have to be a the possibility of damage due to over-rpm and over heating.
Poncho,
Would love to see this in full real also, but I don't think it will happen. You'd have to have a way to control the turbo waste gate at different power settings. I'm not even sure if P47 pilots had to worry about this. I seem to remember reading something about it being automatic. Just the S/C, Water Injection, Mixture and Throttle were controlled by the pilot. Will check my reference materials again and let you know for sure.
S!
OK, now I’m confused again, The turbosupercharger has a compressor driven by the crankshaft, and a compressor driven by the exhaust gas, right?. What is controlled by the s/c lever? And what is relationship between the s/c lever and the turbo rpm gauge/light? I had assumed (maybe incorrectly) that the turbo-rpm was managed by adjusting the s/c lever.
At one point I was looking into programming a functional turbo overspeed light. In my research into how it should work, I found that:
Light off = turbo rpm below optimum
Blinking light- rpm in optimal range
Light solid on= over rpm.
I remember seeing somewhere that the rule of thumb for the pilot was to “keep the light blinking”.
That suggested pilot management to me.
tigerdrummer74 Wrote:I agree about some what if scenarios with the P-51H. Along with the m/n model P-47, it would be great to have the F4U-4 series as these planes saw actual combat sorties in the Pacific. It just seems to me that 1946 should include the -4 Corsair, the P-51H, and the Grumman Bearcat as well as the m/n series Thunderbolt. All these late war planes would be a blast to fly.For F4U-4 look here
Quote:For F4U-4 look here
http://www.sas1946.com/main/index.php/topic,1731.0.html
Murph Wrote:Academic, in any case, since nobody has expressed interest in making these versions yet, so far as I know.