08.08.2010, 22:40
Here is what a real Mig-17 Afterburner looks like. :twisted:
KG64_Cnopicilin Wrote:Man, where are my sausages?that's what she said
RadPig94 Wrote:hock: When a girl looks for her sauseges , we can start to worry .. D:KG64_Cnopicilin Wrote:Man, where are my sausages?that's what she said
Andris6000 Wrote:RadPig94 Wrote:hock: When a girl looks for her sauseges , we can start to worry .. D:KG64_Cnopicilin Wrote:Man, where are my sausages?that's what she said
Verhängnis Wrote:Here are some videos of the MiG-17 with afterburner at various speeds etc. 1st Video shows a good example of what we have in-game whilst flying at near the speed of sound(I assume) 2nd video at slow take off speeds. 3rd video at medium speed pass.
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup ... id=7064970
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTz8bowJgw0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6Sxgx2syx0
Now if modders can make example of all of those stages that would be awesome.
Fireskull Wrote:Hi, Grant
I know that on some jets, the electronics can sometimes have one after-burner on and the other off in unusual circumstances to maintain stability, such as when a gust of cross-wind is encountered. It's obviously unclear about the exact circumstances of this situation.
I wonder how far the modding of after-burners in IL-2 can go? Could the Mig-17 have special timing on after-burner ignition? Would it change in different conditions? I think it would.
US_GRANT Wrote:When I was in the USAF, I was a mechanic on the F-4 Phantom. The afterburners were always used together on take-off. The only reason for it not to be lit is an AB no light. I saw it so many times, we used to take bets on how many acft could get off the ground in a days flying without one failing.ah yes, the work of unpreparedness. i heard these jets weren't originally supposed to be used for fighting. am i wrong? also, can the F-86 outmaneuver an F-4?
RadPig94 Wrote:US_GRANT Wrote:When I was in the USAF, I was a mechanic on the F-4 Phantom. The afterburners were always used together on take-off. The only reason for it not to be lit is an AB no light. I saw it so many times, we used to take bets on how many acft could get off the ground in a days flying without one failing.ah yes, the work of unpreparedness. i heard these jets weren't originally supposed to be used for fighting. am i wrong? also, can the F-86 outmaneuver an F-4?
Fireskull Wrote:hmm you're right :roll:RadPig94 Wrote:How does that relate to the topic about Mig-17 after-burner?
RadPig94 Wrote:US_GRANT Wrote:When I was in the USAF, I was a mechanic on the F-4 Phantom. The afterburners were always used together on take-off. The only reason for it not to be lit is an AB no light. I saw it so many times, we used to take bets on how many acft could get off the ground in a days flying without one failing.ah yes, the work of unpreparedness. i heard these jets weren't originally supposed to be used for fighting. am i wrong? also, can the F-86 outmaneuver an F-4?