16.05.2008, 13:31
![[Image: Vokagain-1.jpg]](http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f148/rigamortiz/Digital%20Artworks/Vokagain-1.jpg)
Victory Over Kent
16.05.2008, 13:56
OMG 
hock:
Light and contrast are perfect
hock:Light and contrast are perfect
16.05.2008, 14:20
Cheers, mate 
16.05.2008, 14:51
See, M8! Told 'ya so! Ya gotta post ur stuff in oder to give people an opportunity to see it and say something both honest and nice about it! :wink:
That's a great image, M8!
That's a great image, M8!
16.05.2008, 16:34
OK, this one is really very... very good. Looks so realistic.
17.05.2008, 04:30
Cheers, whiskey
17.05.2008, 10:09
this is very relistic image, all it makes me stare all the time at it :lol:
17.05.2008, 11:10
Glad you like it. Personally, I hate this image - I think the blending is crap, the angles are all wrong for what I wanted, the Spitfire is too dark, and the shadow from the elevators is terrible. I quite like the 109 though :lol:
17.05.2008, 11:48
rigamortiz Wrote:Glad you like it. Personally, I hate this image - I think the blending is crap, the angles are all wrong for what I wanted, the Spitfire is too dark, and the shadow from the elevators is terrible. I quite like the 109 though :lol:
i dont hate it, i just think that it is a wonderful pic
18.05.2008, 02:28
Man, you're too hard on yourself, M8! hock:
Critque CAN be good for learning for SOME people BUT if you internalize it you can end up never being pleased with even GOOD things that you make! :wink:
I've always maintained that an image is a WHOLE, not a collection of parts to be scrutinized individually. I really think that most people tend to see an image as a whole and like it or not on that basis. I don't think they say, "Well, I like it but I'm not going to buy it because the left ear on the horse isn't shaded enough!" :lol: :wink:
hock: Critque CAN be good for learning for SOME people BUT if you internalize it you can end up never being pleased with even GOOD things that you make! :wink:
I've always maintained that an image is a WHOLE, not a collection of parts to be scrutinized individually. I really think that most people tend to see an image as a whole and like it or not on that basis. I don't think they say, "Well, I like it but I'm not going to buy it because the left ear on the horse isn't shaded enough!" :lol: :wink:
18.05.2008, 02:54
Hehe, I think its just cos I spent a while on it, and it didn't turn out the way I wanted it, and can see all the faults, thats probably why I don't like it, lol.
18.05.2008, 05:09
Awesome!
Where is that set in Kent? I live there ;P
Where is that set in Kent? I live there ;P
18.05.2008, 05:59
Hehe, I have no idea :lol:
Just the general Kent area... :lol:
My source says that Sqn. Ldr. Donald MacDonnell claimed 1 BF109E destroyed, a second as a probable and a third damaged Emil, a half share in a He111 destroyed and a second Heinkel damaged during action over Kent. I originally read that as they were all done over Kent, but, now reading it, it makes it sound like the only one over Kent may have been the damaged Heinkel. Wow... Sounds like this was all in one sortie, as it goes on to say "Heading back to Hawkinge, his ammunition exhausted, MacDonnell was jumped by a Bf109 and forced to bale out"
Just the general Kent area... :lol:
My source says that Sqn. Ldr. Donald MacDonnell claimed 1 BF109E destroyed, a second as a probable and a third damaged Emil, a half share in a He111 destroyed and a second Heinkel damaged during action over Kent. I originally read that as they were all done over Kent, but, now reading it, it makes it sound like the only one over Kent may have been the damaged Heinkel. Wow... Sounds like this was all in one sortie, as it goes on to say "Heading back to Hawkinge, his ammunition exhausted, MacDonnell was jumped by a Bf109 and forced to bale out"
18.05.2008, 07:13
Wow.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)