13.06.2011, 13:55
http://www.wthr.com/story/14893917/vint ... n-illinois
This is sad to see a plane like this now gone for ever
Deutschmark
This is sad to see a plane like this now gone for ever
Deutschmark
B 17 Down Very Sad.
13.06.2011, 14:00
That is extremely sad news
I do hope they find a way of restoring it
Planemad
I do hope they find a way of restoring it
Planemad
13.06.2011, 20:16
i got 2 50cal bullets this year when it came 2 houston at hooks. I also went in it... :| ... ... 
... :x ... :evil: ... :OO
... ... :x ... :evil: ... :OO
14.06.2011, 01:14
That is very sad indeed - but they rebuild other planes from scratch or wreckage before. Hopefully this one as well...
14.06.2011, 01:23
Jambo Wrote:That is very sad indeed - but they rebuild other planes from scratch or wreckage before. Hopefully this one as well...
All we can do is hope
Planemad
14.06.2011, 03:36
Such a waste....
...I love it when people take thier time and money to restore beautiful aircraft to
thier former glory. Very sad indeed, hopefully this will not be the last of this plane
and that people will rebuild it.
AdamB
...I love it when people take thier time and money to restore beautiful aircraft to
thier former glory. Very sad indeed, hopefully this will not be the last of this plane
and that people will rebuild it.
AdamB
14.06.2011, 06:55
WTF !!!
What a very very sad news here... Fortunately the crew (7 people on board) survived.
I hope they would be able to rebuild it.
Hope it will refly one day.
Ted
What a very very sad news here... Fortunately the crew (7 people on board) survived.
I hope they would be able to rebuild it.
Hope it will refly one day.
Ted
14.06.2011, 09:36
LeBigTed Wrote:WTF !!!
What a very very sad news here... Fortunately the crew (7 people on board) survived.
I hope they would be able to rebuild it.
Hope it will refly one day.
Ted
They were very lucky I have to say, I am glad they survived
Planemad
15.06.2011, 04:17
You have right my friend,
I think B17's crew have a lot of knowledge and those people who are able to make fly a B17 are not numerous.
Ted
I think B17's crew have a lot of knowledge and those people who are able to make fly a B17 are not numerous.
Ted
15.06.2011, 09:01
LeBigTed Wrote:You have right my friend,
I think B17's crew have a lot of knowledge and those people who are able to make fly a B17 are not numerous.
Agreed 8)
Planemad
18.06.2011, 14:42
Very sad news, glad no one was hurt
03.07.2011, 06:21
This is always going to be the risk when keeping vintage aircraft flying. There is a growing movement to ground valuable historic aeroplanes, many of which require skills that are becoming rarer today, and indeed after a belly landing by a Bf109G due to engine trouble, the RAF (who own the airframe) promptly had it put in a museum permanently.
However, there's no guarantee that disaster won't befall the aeroplanes once trapped inside their new homes. Buildings sometimes catch fire or collapse. Also, the preservation in static display removes some =thing vital for those who wish to experience the aeroplane in the flesh. There's no movement, no noise, no smell, nothing to suggest what these aeroplanes were actually like in real life. As I've said in the past, aeroplanes in museums are little more than stuffed birds in glass cases.
My own view is we should keep these aeroplanes flying as long as possible. The temptation to mount increasingly exciting displays should be suppressed though. For me, even a fly-by is enough. Listen to that big engine rumble and snarl. Watch a piece of history do what it was intended to do in the first place.
Flying is never 100% safe. Wafare is a dangerous time and many airmen lost their lives in similar machines. Since these machines are less than perfect flyers and for that matter designed to accentuate every last scrap of performance, they don't compromise and aren't always too forgiving. It's a mark of the dedication and skill of those lucky people who fly these things that fatal accidents are rare.
However, there's no guarantee that disaster won't befall the aeroplanes once trapped inside their new homes. Buildings sometimes catch fire or collapse. Also, the preservation in static display removes some =thing vital for those who wish to experience the aeroplane in the flesh. There's no movement, no noise, no smell, nothing to suggest what these aeroplanes were actually like in real life. As I've said in the past, aeroplanes in museums are little more than stuffed birds in glass cases.
My own view is we should keep these aeroplanes flying as long as possible. The temptation to mount increasingly exciting displays should be suppressed though. For me, even a fly-by is enough. Listen to that big engine rumble and snarl. Watch a piece of history do what it was intended to do in the first place.
Flying is never 100% safe. Wafare is a dangerous time and many airmen lost their lives in similar machines. Since these machines are less than perfect flyers and for that matter designed to accentuate every last scrap of performance, they don't compromise and aren't always too forgiving. It's a mark of the dedication and skill of those lucky people who fly these things that fatal accidents are rare.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)