That's very interesting. I was hoping there might be other players who realize that only full scale maps belong in a game that was intended to be modeled after the real world as apposed to a fantasy like world that is out of scale. I would suggest however that IL2 is best suited for tactical level gaming which is why to me it makes more sense to have the maps only cover a smaller section of the world. To me the most important thing is that a reasonable attempt is made to model the most significant features of an area and to keep the distance from one point to the next as accurate as possible. Also the altitudes of the mountains should be about the same as in the real world. Obviously however every detail can't possibly be accurate or the map would take too long too load to be practical. I've heard the argument that reduced scale maps make it possible to play campaign style games however I don't buy that at all. If an island for example were about 100 miles long and about 50 miles wide in the real world and someone creates a map to which they claim is the same island but it is only 75 miles long and 37.5 miles wide, I would submit that they have not modeled the island that they claim to have modeled and it is instead a fictitious island. Not modeling every little feature of each town will have very little effect on game play while reducing the height of the mountains and distances from one airfield to another by 50 or 25 % would have a huge effect on the game play. The bottom line is that it wouldn't be at all the same mission on a reduced scale map and it would be delusional in my opinion to pretend that it is the same mission as the one at full scale.
Henry_Shrapnel wrote," To me the most important thing is that a reasonable attempt is made to model the most significant features of an area and to keep the distance from one point to the next as accurate as possible. "
I agree with you completely for a map of this nature and size. While certain cities and historical areas need to be somewhat accurate, a map of this nature would be used differently than one for a much smaller area. BRUNS of high altitude would be the most common use but I'm sure there would be developed certain dogfights in key areas.
But this is only my opinion and a map of this stature and size should be somewhat easier to make due to lack of exacting detail as opposed to one for BOB. It wouldn't surprise me to find that those who are developing maps for BOB also in a short time of releasing the BOB map, release one of European size with less detail. Again just my opinion.
-kapteeni-
Can you make a map of England to north west part of Europe,
and
east France to west Germany
-- size similar to Biscay (means as big as possible)
Posts: 703
Threads: 9
Joined: Nov 2007
Henry_Shrapnel Wrote:That's very interesting. blah blah blah ... scale.
If you arent happy with a map, dont install it and avoid playing on it. Simple.
TEAM PACIFIC