[ArcticViper]

Cnopcilin, try to stay on topic please

Looks good guys, the unknown types are really just as useful and interesting as the more well known ones.

Cheers
Arctic

[Plumps]

Cnopcilin, try to stay on topic please

Looks good guys, the unknown types are really just as useful and interesting as the more well known ones.

Cheers
Arctic

+1
As of seaplanes this one would be real nice as it was active in search and recue missions.

[Fafnir_6]

If you guys need Ju52-1m references, CF-ARM is preserved in the Winnipeg air museum in pretty decent condition (I last saw it in 1991). I imagine the museum staff would help any Winnipeggers here get some photos if they are needed.

Cheers,

Fafnir_6

[XB-49]

I agree with Fusek. Civillian aircraft were often destroyed during air raids, commandered by the military, and occasionaly intercepted by fighters and sometimes even shot down. They will also make very good target practice. :lol:

Why aren't the warplanes good for target practicing?

Warplanes (multi-engined ones) almost always have guns. And they are deadly in the hands of AI gunners. :twisted:

[Zorin]

Cnopcilin, try to stay on topic please

Looks good guys, the unknown types are really just as useful and interesting as the more well known ones.

Cheers
Arctic

I have to disagree on this. Out of the total of 6 aircraft that were build, only 4 were equipped with a BMW engine. Yet, only 3 used the uprated type that allowed for decent performance. So we would have 3 planes which were all converted to target tugs in 1940, how can that be useful?

[mmielli]

Cnopcilin, try to stay on topic please

Looks good guys, the unknown types are really just as useful and interesting as the more well known ones.

Cheers
Arctic

I have to disagree on this. Out of the total of 6 aircraft that were build, only 4 were equipped with a BMW engine. Yet, only 3 used the uprated type that allowed for decent performance. So we would have 3 planes which were all converted to target tugs in 1940, how can that be useful?

Hi Zorin, i tink little useful for civilian transpot, and the firs prototype have 1845 kg load capacity, and some units are sold for Canadian, Brazilian and Bolivian Airlines
And the bolivians sugest the adicional engines in this plane.

http://www.edcoatescollection.com/ac4/CF-ARM.html

http://www.aviastar.org/air/germany/ju-52-1m.php

http://www.ipmstoronto.com/articles/aircraft/ju52-1/



Ju52/1mba, Ju52/1m prototype with Junkers L88 engine, Sept. 1931, only testflights
Ju52/1mbe, Ju52/1m prototype with BMW VIIaU of Sept. 1930
Ju52/1mbi, second prototype with A.S. Leopard engine in March 1932, initial landplane
Ju52/1mcai, with BMW IXU engine in 1933 (5th aircraft)
Ju52/1mcao, with Rolls Royce Bussard, export version for Canada (6th aircraft)
Ju52/1mce, increased wing swept and V-wing, 3rd, 4th and 7th aircraft, take off weight 7200kg
Ju52/1mci, second prototype after conversion into seaplane, July 1931
Ju52/1mdi, second prototype with strengthened undercarriage and wing, increased wing swept
Ju52/1mdo, testbed for Jumo 4 testflights (original prototype converted)
K45c, one test aircraft as torpedo bomber by A.B Flygindustri

http://www.geocities.com/hjunkers/ju_ju52_a1.htm

http://www.wcam.mb.ca/junkers.html

http://www.wcam.mb.ca/junkers-archive.html

[Guest]

BUMP... Any news?

[GenSwat]

Thinking some one should make a map non existant one... with an IL2 museum.. with all the model planes and bombs, objects in it... to bad you couldnt walk around in it!!! lol

like a big hanger you spawn in and you taxi around lookin at the stuff


be kewl but probly not worth it...