Multi-Core CPUs working in il2 with all the cores
#31

Okay, now I just went back and compared again my FPS with threaded opt. turned on or off in the Nvidia CP and with either PAM=0, PAM=3 and ;PAM= and ran an N track of an Okinawa airbase attack. This airbase attack for some reason really messes with my FPS (and I use the newest Platinum effects with water=2) so I figured it's a good test.

With threaded set to off I start with 60FPS with v-sync on dipping down at one point to 33(!). Probably 98% of the time it is 55-60. Whenever optimisation was set to on I got anywhere between 42-55 FPS dipping to well under 20 when I strafed some planes on the runway. I also got a CTD.

I have no doubt whatsoever that if you're running a dual core setup you need to keep Nvidia's threaded optimisation off with ProcessAffinityMask as either =0 or =3. Course, when I go quadcore next month I look forward to going through all of this again(!)...
Reply
#32

Trooper117 Wrote:I don't even pretend to fully understand some of the terms used or the complex looking settings that are being displayed here, but I've just set my PAM setting to 0, ran the 'black death' track in game, and for the first time I've watched it without a single stutter!
I'm assuming that all of my cores are now sharing the load somewhat, as I've never watched that track without a stutter here and there..
What is the 'black death' track?
What processor do you have?

~S~
Reply
#33

Hey guys, I want to pop in for a quick note here:

These processafinitymask tweaks do not appear to add any performance enhancement, at least I can not note any in various configs. I've tried them all, "0" gives the most overall FPS, as I wrote in my tweak guide some time ago.

However, this new nHancer tweak for multicore support via driver is HUGE. It gives me roughly 60-70% increase in performance (with a Q6600 @ 3.2ghz, tested via The Black Death) and that is gigantic. I will definitely make sure to include this tweak in the next edition of the tweak guide. Good find.

Edit: And this is even running IL2 via WinlauncherXP specified to use only 1 core. Confusedhock: Hell of an optimization!

Edit2: And now I'm confused. After doing a little tweaking further I am unable to return to the performance increase I had previously, even restoring the original conf.ini doesn't give back the performance I was seeing. Cry
Reply
#34

Hello, i installed the latest NVIDIA driver yesterday and also changed the PAM to 3, and now i doubled the fps.
Great.
After that i put all the driver values in default and still the same fps values.
My laptop who had to be optimised now works like a charm.
Thanks guys.

Eric Lotgerink
Reply
#35

BigSilverHotdog Wrote:Hey guys, I want to pop in for a quick note here:

These processafinitymask tweaks do not appear to add any performance enhancement, at least I can not note any in various configs. I've tried them all, "0" gives the most overall FPS, as I wrote in my tweak guide some time ago.

However, this new nHancer tweak for multicore support via driver is HUGE. It gives me roughly 60-70% increase in performance (with a Q6600 @ 3.2ghz, tested via The Black Death) and that is gigantic. I will definitely make sure to include this tweak in the next edition of the tweak guide. Good find.

Edit: And this is even running IL2 via WinlauncherXP specified to use only 1 core. Confusedhock: Hell of an optimization!

Edit2: And now I'm confused. After doing a little tweaking further I am unable to return to the performance increase I had previously, even restoring the original conf.ini doesn't give back the performance I was seeing. Cry

This same thing happened to me. Solution was found in the nHancer feature of making an executable file with a file path from the file in that particular IL-2 folder to the nHancer profile. Now I am seeing good FPS, including other performances, and fantastic appearance. Everthing in IL-2 is at its max as far as appearance with the exception of perfect water which lowers my FPS too much. I run DirectX online for performance, usually. For offline I mostly use OpenGL. I actually have four profiles in nHancer that I can start manually. I choose one and activate it manually just before I start IL-2. Some features in nHancer can only be utilized if the profile is activated manually. At least one of them requires an executable file Profile with file path. Here is where many guys miss it. I hope this helps.

P.S. I am using only an NVIDIA GeForce Go 7150M in my HP Notebook PC with 3GB RAM. I have most of my settings at max or beyond (nHancer :wink: ). Visual quality is set at VERY HIGH. Interesting that I get waves with caps on water=2 in
DirectX but no show with "Perfect Water" =3 in OpenGL. What gives? May be that the perfect water ain't so perfect. :roll: LOL
Reply
#36

Fireskull Wrote:This same thing happened to me. Solution was found in the nHancer feature of making an executable file with a file path from the file in that particular IL-2 folder to the nHancer profile. Now I am seeing good FPS, including other performances, and fantastic appearance. Everthing in IL-2 is at its max as far as appearance with the exception of perfect water which lowers my FPS too much. I run DirectX online for performance, usually. For offline I mostly use OpenGL. I actually have four profiles in nHancer that I can start manually. I choose one and activate it manually just before I start IL-2. Some features in nHancer can only be utilized if the profile is activated manually. At least one of them requires an executable file Profile with file path. Here is where many guys miss it. I hope this helps.

P.S. I am using only an NVIDIA GeForce Go 7150M in my HP Notebook PC with 3GB RAM. I have most of my settings at max or beyond (nHancer :wink: ). Visual quality is set at VERY HIGH. Interesting that I get waves with caps on water=2 in
DirectX but no show with "Perfect Water" =3 in OpenGL. What gives? May be that the perfect water ain't so perfect. :roll: LOL

What do you mean by "making an executable file with a file path from the file in that particular IL-2 folder to the nHancer profile"? Do you mean adding the executable to the profile list? Of course I've done that, you have to for automatic profiling to work. And none of the options I use for IL2 require manual activation of the profile, so there's nothing missed there.
Reply
#37

Good question, bro, I was hoping that someone would ask.

My computer has several versions of IL-2. I like to at least have the il2fb.exe folder as an executable, since it is the first file that the computer reads on start of IL-2. The nHancer will be sure to have the Profile active and ready as that IL-2 version starts.

Further, that means there are several il2fb.exe folders in my computer. What adding a File Path to an Executable does for me is that I can make at least one Profile for each version of IL-2 and be certain that the Profile will only connect and activate with the il2fb.exe folder in the version of IL-2 that I want it to apply.

As a bonus, I can have different Profiles for the same version of IL-2 for various purposes. The Executable with File Path keeps everything secure and in order among my Profiles and versions of IL-2. It makes certain that no Profile is made in vain. It keeps everthing clear and sure in the user's mind.

For example, I have a version of IL-2 for online combat that has more performance oriented settings. A Profile was named by me in the Application box of nHancer called "IL-2 Forgotten Battles: Online Performance". In the Executables box is the executable file/folder-in this case il2fb.exe with the complete File Path. For that Profile, all I have in the Executables box is this: C:\Program Files\Ubisoft\IL-2 Sturmovik 1946\il2fb.exe\ The nHancer will read the File Path that the user indicates from the beginning at the disk-"C:", in my case-all the way to the exact folder at the end of the File Path.

For a copy of IL-2 that I use for offline movies when I need "perfect water" and jaggies removed, I have a separate Profile for it, named in the Application box as "IL-2 FB: Offline High Quality". This IL-2 is in a different folder, so it has a different File Path in nHancer to the sim (than the other IL-2), so I include it in the Profile. This Profile has a different unique File Path made in the Executable box when I activate the Profile.

The version of nHancer that I have is 2.4.5 and it gives instructions to me as I activate each feature of it. The nHancer tells me which features require that a particular Profile be activated manually. This is indicated in the Settings section to the right of my nHancer interface. When we click on each tab-Enhancements, Optimizations, and Compatibility-we find at the right little signs.

Auto shows that the feature on that line is activated automatically when the profile's application is started. OGL sign means that the option on that line is for OpenGL only and is activated automatically when the profile's application is started. A/M sign indicates that the function on that line is activated automatically for OpenGL and it is only activated for Direct 3D if the profile is activated manually.

For anyone who wonders, to activate a Profile manually you would go to the Tray icon of nHancer, right click on it, put your cursor on Activate Profile, and put a check in front of the Profile that you want to activate. These are the Profiles listed that you designated by putting a check in the box called Profile can be activated manually, near the Executables box in the nHancer interface. You can make changes to settings in the Tray icon, as well.

To summerize (wow, I'm trying not to use big words for everyone's sake), if you have only one version of IL-2 and only one Profile for it, then all you need is a file/folder indicated in the Executable of nHancer. If you have a bunch of stuff, then I recommend including a File Path, at least for the sake of clarity in your own mind.

By the way, I have discovered recently that DirectX renders different aspects of water that do not appear in OpenGL "perfect water" setting. Since DirectX renders everything else at maximum settings in my rig while having better performance (including FPS) than OpenGL, I use DirectX most of the time. My processaffinitymask=3 (no ; Wink ). In DirectX, I am using both cores, confirmed with Task Manager Resource Monitor, as well as 18-28 threads. AA and AF are at 16X, High Quality. My conf.ini has all settings at Max (except so-called "perfect water"). My FPS is 30-50 while running the track called "Black Death", which is very demanding on FPS-but NO stuttering. The nHancer has made even the Black Death track run silky smooth.

This reply is very relevent to this Topic by "peybolman" because nHancer enforces Multi Core and Multi Threading. The nHancer has made this possible. Windows Task Manager Resource Monitor clearly proves this. The monitors show it to be true.

I understand that guys with different computers, hardware, and drivers may find a unique method to optimization. This works great for me, however.

You know what they say, right? " The proof is in the pudding " :wink: I hope this helps guys.

Thanks, "peybolman" for this great topic.

P.S. All I have is an ordinary laptop computer.
______________________________________________________________________________________
*HP Pavilion dv6815nr Notebook PC ( A 2007-2008 model), 3GB RAM, 5GB Page File Size increased by me (C and D disks total)
AMD Turion 64x2 Dual Core, only 2.0 Ghz
Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bit Operating System
------------------------
*NVIDIA GeForce Go 7150M (Card won't accept later model card drivers)

With this system I get 30-50 FPS in DirectX with all Max settings or higher, little-but usually NO stuttering. My system doesn't seem to like OpenGL.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)