[MOD][BETA] JapanCat Bf-109 v0.086 *UPDATE*
#91

Woot! new update :thumbsup:


erf i have problem with the file corupt.
Reply
#92

At me the same. I download 2 times and "file corrupt"...
Reply
#93

thanks japancat Big Grin
Reply
#94

Savoy_11 Wrote:Alo JC Salute Big Grin

Thanks Fine 109's ,, and Happy new year :o)

I got that Files from Media-file Server....
And melting that should makes Erra///

JCats_Me109/3do/plane/Bf-109Z/GearL6_D0.msh
inflating to .000/JCats_Me109/3do/plane/Bf-109Z/GearL6_D0.msh
bad CRC f5fdf04b (should be 6c9b2505)

I do Browser Cash Clear and try Downloading at 3 times but it same erra woke up////
:roll:

I'm sorry.

A file, UPLOAD, again.

Please retry.
Reply
#95

I got new one and no Erra.
Ty JC S!
Reply
#96

Savoy_11 Wrote:I got new one and no Erra.
Ty JC S!

HI, Savoy_11

Long time no see

Thank you very much your report. JapanCat
Reply
#97

yay sweet no crc error this time Big Grin
Reply
#98

this is by far one of the best mods ever! Thank you Japancat!!

I noticed something strange last night, I don't know if it was like this before, but the bomb rack on the Bf109 G2 (the one I tried!) seemed to be off the center of the plane.
Also, would you be able to work on the MG51/20 and Mk108 gunpods? They look really really bad compared to the rest of the model now!

A.
Reply
#99

Thx for fast fixe. Tongue
Reply

Arigato JapanCat,

I'm sure you already know that your mod is superb! The new 109 are really beautiful and are "almost" perfect Smile

Here is a strange thing i noticed: there's a part of the left leading edge slats that is missing when looking at the aircraft from a distance, that is maybe due to the modification of the pitot tube:

[Image: il2fb2010-01-0818-57-31-54.jpg]

[Image: il2fb2010-01-0818-57-00-98.jpg]

[Image: il2fb2010-01-0818-57-11-37.jpg]

[Image: il2fb2010-01-0818-56-43-25.jpg]

I hope it can help you, or maybe this is just on my computer

:?:

Again, thank you very much for sharing your talent so generously! Smile
Reply

BlueImpulse16 Wrote:Arigato JapanCat,

I'm sure you already know that your mod is superb! The new 109 are really beautiful and are "almost" perfect Smile

Here is a strange thing i noticed: there's a part of the left leading edge slats that is missing when looking at the aircraft from a distance, that is maybe due to the modification of the pitot tube:

I hope it can help you, or maybe this is just on my computer

:?:

Again, thank you very much for sharing your talent so generously! Smile

Hi, BlueImpulse16

I'm thankful for your report.
I'm going to investigate and correct.

Thank you very much. JapanCat
Reply

In the second-to-last pic, it looks like the leading edge slat is moved inboard from its correct position. just my 2 cents...
Reply

All the small things...but these make all the difference in the world. Seriously that's really a great job mate. I just tested the 109 and the Ki-43 and they just look superb. Thanks for these. 8) Smile Big Grin
Reply

@Japancat, I have downloaded and installed your last version of this great addition and I continued my investigations on the already realized skins and there is a lot...:-?

If I may allow to indicate that certain points of these corrections impose to resume many of existing skins, not to say all... Sad


For example the tube pitot which you redid completely, the new model is completed but I am convinced that it would have been necessary to resume the same place as the former for the mapping as on the following screen:

[Image: Bf-109G-4_7-Rouge.jpg]

I made personally some skins of 109 and I do not absolutely want to have to propose again them only because of a small modification such as that there, and I think of not being the only one skinner to think of it. So much that I preferred to take place of your news legs of landing gear what is pity.

It is very important to keep in mind that a quite small modification on a msh can have very big repercussions on the rest afterward.
Reply

:loveeyes: :loveeyes: :loveeyes:
I have to agree with Claymore though...about the unnessesary changes of skin mapping.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)