Choose an allied bomber! I`ll make it!
#46

How about Douglas TBD Devastator? saw much action in the early stages of the war.. than the Vindicator

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TBD_Devastator
Reply
#47

Hudson FTW
Reply
#48

B-26 Marauder
http://b26marauder.com/
Reply
#49

baracuda!
Reply
#50

Some one is working on the Barracuda, but im am not sure if it is dead or not.
Reply
#51

As far as i know, all lithuanians are proud of ANBO-VIII, one of most advanced pre-war light bombers, so, lots of people would appreciate it.

Quite easy to make, something like R-10, but... better =]

[Image: straipsniui-anbo8.jpg]

[Image: anbo8-1projekcija.jpg]

Also, lithuanian pilots are dreaming about something like other ANBOs (III, IV, 41) and Dobi-III...
Reply
#52

Marauder (don´t you feel a D-Day mission empty without she?)
Hudson (out of the northeast coast of Brazil hunting U-boats and Regia marina subs)
Potez (BOF)
Reply
#53

very nice of you!!! Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin
Reply
#54

I would like to see (and fly :wink: ) the A-26. It was a verry good attack and bombing aircarft.

The late war version with 8 MG-Nose and 6 Mg wings the bottom turret remouved + Rocket projectiles would be fun!

Doc
Reply
#55

Many people feel that we need British bombers.

This would open many new mission possibilities. Big Grin

Maybe one of the other British planes would be a nice appetizer. 8)
Reply
#56

A-26 Invader

This is my favorite bomber!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXAOaVyF ... re=related
Reply
#57

Fireskull Wrote:Many people feel that we need British bombers.

This would open many new mission possibilities. Big Grin

Maybe one of the other British planes would be a nice appetizer. 8)

+1

We need more 4 engined Bomber like...
Stirling

The Stirling, designed prior to the Lancaster and Halifax, was an enormous aircraft, with four engines and a crew of seven. Throughout its service its design limitations (chiefly its wings being too short for the large size of the aircraft) resulted in poor performance and a high loss rate.

[Image: four_c_three.gif]

Manchester

The twin-engine Manchester was not a successful aircraft, being under-powered by two very unreliable engines. But in re-developed form with the addition of two further improved engines and a longer wingspan it evolved into the famous Lancaster bomber.

[Image: four_b_four.gif]

Planemad
Reply
#58

I think the Stirling is WIP Wink
Reply
#59

philip.ed Wrote:I think the Stirling is WIP Wink

This is probably true. There are many WIP projects right now. Quite often, people quit a project or set it aside for months or more and return to it. Just to finish it from start to end with no interruption takes a few months to create a detailed aeroplane for IL-2 ( depending on how much free time the person has ).

Remember all the talk about the B-26 Martin Marauder WIP? This popular plane has been in posts for years. How far WIP is it now?

Obviously, we need a better system to keep track of WIP projects. Here is another of many needs for unification.

Until then, some of this will be trial and error.
Reply
#60

I have some work done in the Baltimore...


Attached Files
.jpg baltimore_grab01 small.jpg Size: 99,52 KB  Downloads: 171
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)