[rzwan2007]

hay i have been warned that i spam this site and i dont use the search option.But this sight have not given me a solution about what do i have to do to make my avenger ventral gunner,and b-29 belly gunner available. ( i think its a problem with HSFX not with UP)

but its OK
i have a another question and this was never asked before in this sight

WHEN I FLY FW-189 I CANT FIRE THE BACK GUNNER (but that's OK)
BUT I CANT GET THE Bomb Sight . all i can get is the tail gunner.after that cockpit again


please can any one answer this question what do i have to do about this

[Murph]

I'm ready to be corrected by someone more knowledgeable but I think the FW 189 was a reconnaissance aircraft, not a bomber. Therefore there would be no bombs, hence no need for a bomb sight.

[rzwan2007]

I'm ready to be corrected by someone more knowledgeable but I think the FW 189 was a reconnaissance aircraft, not a bomber. Therefore there would be no bombs, hence no need for a bomb sight.

But there is a bombadier in the plane and a bomber position

[KG64_Cnopicilin]

I'm ready to be corrected by someone more knowledgeable but I think the FW 189 was a reconnaissance aircraft, not a bomber. Therefore there would be no bombs, hence no need for a bomb sight.

But there is a bombadier in the plane and a bomber position

He is not bombardier, he is the photographer/navigator etc.

[Guest]

Yes it was a recon plane but don't quite a few recon planes have the ability to carry bombs just in case?

[Oscarito]

Hi m8!

I am just trying to understand... :roll:
We have a dozen of capable machines to drop bombs on the enemy. Just choose one of them.
Why do you want to use a specific reccon purpose designed aircraft to perform this task?
It's not very reasonable! Don't you agree?

S!

[nyali]

On the subject of spam....didnt someone create a thread JUST for your questions rzwan2007 ?

edit :- (The link is inoperative)

[KG64_Cnopicilin]

[quote="Verh

[Rjel]

On the subject of spam....didnt someone create a thread JUST for your questions rzwan2007 ?

edit :- (The link is inoperative)

I don't think that was done as a way to help him or even as a requirement he post there. Do you? Or are we all going to be issued personal question threads? :? Regardless his question got answered here.

[nyali]

I thought it was done due to the sheer volumn of questions he produces...

[KG64_Cnopicilin]

At least 2 questions a day...

[Rjel]

Well I rarely ask any so I can let him use some of my quota. That should even it all out and keep everyone happy. 8)

[Oscarito]

I think I was the only one who tried to answer him at their special assigned thread! Why not? He deserves this distinction because at least he has some style! And in fact he is probably smarter than many people here because he managed this site to put himself in evidence in a short time and without doing any hard work to the point of receiving a personal wagon on the train... I would said he is risked to become a hero!

PS.: Just an alternative point of view. It does not hurt. :wink:

[Guest]

Totally Off-Topic...