[HunInTheSun]

It is a well known fact in every county that "official goverment documents" are filled with errors.

This sentence is as true as saying that nobody in Germany after 1938 talked/wrote "Me109". :roll:
Look at this HISTORICAL technical document:



Here
http://home.planet.nl/~jan88076/Onderzo ... enpag3.htm


For sure,there isn't Me109 written on it,you see? :lol:



Oh,another source "filled with errors" just for you Sturmbock:

Various myths
It's not Me 109, it is Bf 109, you dork!
Both are correct for the Messerschmitt 109 fighter. Both the factory and the Luftwaffe used both designations throughout the life of the 109. Both Bf 109 and Me 109 appear in "official" documents from a variety of 'official sources, from the production facilities themselves to internal RLM docs. It is wrong to say that 'Me 109' is incorrect or that Bf was terminated during construction of the 108-109-series fighter. These alternative designations didn't stop at the Gustav; many Augsburg documents from the last months of the war still used the Bf prefix. For simplicity, this article usually refers to the plane as Me 109.


Here
http://www.virtualpilots.fi/feature/art ... ths/#myths



Bf and Me prefix are both correct,concerning the 109
And i choose...the "Me" one for the sim. 8)