[Scharnhorst1943]

Mine would be a replacement for stock. I would try to be as historical as possible, but at the same time I want to cover a broader area. JustaV has done MARVOLOUS work wich is very in depth and detailed, but the scope of what is covered is somewhat narrow. You will find there is give and take. You can have a very detailed, in depth campaign covering a narrow aspect of the whole war, or you can cover all or most aspects of the entire theater, but you loose a little bit of detail. Both are good, because each has its possotive and negative. I would not say one is better or worse than the other, just different.

I plan for my campaigns to be as in depth as possible, but I want to cover the big picture of the overall war at the same time. It is kindof a juggling act to find the right balance. The whole thing is kind of a grey area. And no matter what I do, there will be those who love my work and others who think it is total crap. It all boils down to opinion. So I guess my goal is to be good enough to at least please everyone. In my campaigns I plan on incorporating level bombing with new bombers, invasions too. I have tried my best to put more inphasis on certain battles (Pearl Harbor, Midway, Coral Sea, Santa Cruz, Philippine Sea, Battle of the Bulge, Battle of Britain ...)