22.03.2008, 08:44
The ta183
1- wing racks should be removed in clean config.(better aerodynamics, higher speed)
2- Possibilty for only 2 X-4 or 2 external fuel tanks
3- possibility of only 1 fuel tank under the hard-point between the landing gear or a sc250 or 1
BT400 aerial torpedo(+2 fuel tanks underwings in the bt400 case)
4- Splitting the 4 guns in 2 groups like on the 262.
5- RM-24 underwings WITHOUT the 4 wing-racks.
The Go229 or morelikely Ho-IX :wink:
No bomb load! structural integrity not capable of taking a bomb in the air.
The plane having already a nose ballast of 600kg to compensate the CoG.
Go229 :nothing to do with the 3x1000 Goering request.
See(good book !): http://www.historicaviation.com/histori ... -(CgqOmhPi)?ID=6159
1- wing racks should be removed in clean config.(better aerodynamics, higher speed)
2- Possibilty for only 2 X-4 or 2 external fuel tanks
3- possibility of only 1 fuel tank under the hard-point between the landing gear or a sc250 or 1
BT400 aerial torpedo(+2 fuel tanks underwings in the bt400 case)
4- Splitting the 4 guns in 2 groups like on the 262.
5- RM-24 underwings WITHOUT the 4 wing-racks.
The Go229 or morelikely Ho-IX :wink:
No bomb load! structural integrity not capable of taking a bomb in the air.
The plane having already a nose ballast of 600kg to compensate the CoG.
Go229 :nothing to do with the 3x1000 Goering request.
See(good book !): http://www.historicaviation.com/histori ... -(CgqOmhPi)?ID=6159