21.02.2009, 04:43
yes fatsre responce times =better much better. Faster responce times( 2ms as apposed to 5ms ) would mean les blurring. for example, waggle your mouse on your desktop, if you have a lower responce time your mouse pointer will blurr , the higher this will become less appaernt. If you dont believe me or think im talking out of my arse look at all the gaming monitors,(yes they do make them but they are very expensive) this is what i did when choosing my monitor. Also lower responce times reduce eye strain , which is a must if your spending long periods playing Il2. The 20in monitor i brought (from p.c world) i think has the best of both worlds for a reasonable price. fast responce time 2ms and a 20,000:1 responce time all for 150 pounds sterling. however this all depends on what budget you have. Remenber raster responce times does = a better monitor, they are always the mot expensive.
oh and another point to consider before you rush off, the bigger screen you have the better graphics card you will need to run it
oh and another point to consider before you rush off, the bigger screen you have the better graphics card you will need to run it