05.04.2009, 04:47
Quote:"Erhm, what? C3 is the fuel being used on the plane, namely 97octane. I cant think of any DB605 engine that ran on C3 fuel that was actually used on the G-6 in numbers! Such engines would be the DB605 ASC & DC, none of those were used on the G-6 and were reserved for later models such as the G-10/-14/K-4"
[img]http://www.chiasal.it/foto%20d'epoca/album/slides/Me109G6-C31.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.chiasal.it/foto%20d'epoca/album/slides/Me109G6-C32.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.chiasal.it/foto%20d'epoca/album/slides/Immagine_1.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.chiasal.it/foto%20d'epoca/album/slides/Immagine_2.jpg[/img]
Karaya, Oleg's FM of all Bf 109's is a One Big Bug and you know "that".
Quote:Its just that the G6 is HOPELESSLY undermodelled and some of the other 109s are also undermodelled in various performance characteristic (109F turntimes for example)
Quote:It might very well be that the 109Friedrich simply is undermodelled in its handling which most test data points towards.
Bf 109G-2 ingame slower at some altitude
for example
ingame: 549 km/h - 1000 m (retractable tail wheel)
In RL: soviet test. 554 km/h - 1000 m (non-retractable tail wheel)
ingame: 581 km/h - 2750 m (retractable tail wheel)
In RL: soviet test. 598 km/h - 2750 m (non-retractable tail wheel)
ingame: 585 km/h - 3000 m (retractable tail wheel)
In RL: soviet test. 602 km/h - 3000 m (non-retractable tail wheel)
Anyway.Thank you for your work.