[genbrien]

BTW 5 or 60 makes no difference as the human eye/brain can only comprehend/see at 30 and below. anything above a rock steady 30 you will not see any difference. what you really want is a setting where the lowest framerate doesn't drop below 30fps anything else is not needed.

I would beg that you and your likes stop spreading this misconception,
which has no basis in reality and even less so in games.

Firstly:
I challange you to _not_ see any differance between 30 and 60 FPS
in these neat applications by Andreas Gustavsson
http://www.tweakguides.com/files/FPSCom ... 5_beta.zip
http://www.tweakguides.com/files/FPSComp_Old.zip
(Link provided via http://www.tweakguides.com/Graphics_5.html)


Secondly:
When you accept that even your eyes, easily, can tell the differance between
30 and 60 FPS, I urge you to read through the sources I have provided below.

Finally:
If you persist in claiming that an FPS above 30 is not neccessary, do so knowing
that you are spreading an outright lie.


Sources:
100fps: How to deinterlace Video the right way.
http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_c ... ns_see.htm

Human Eye Frames Per Second
http://amo.net/NT/02-21-01FPS.html

30 Frames per Second vs. 60 Frames per Second
http://www.daniele.ch/school/30vs60/30vs60_1.html

totally agree. But depending of the game's type, it matters more or less
FPS should not be played under 60fps. Take CoD4-5 for exemple. I'm always playing at 60fps(vsync on), but when I'm sniping sometimes it drop to 50 and I noticed it instently, making the game harder to play. But in Il2, being 50 instead of 60 wont make the difference between a kill or a miss, IMO