Thread Closed

Ta-152 C versions & corrections
#34

"I see no harm in somebody going through and creating new-slot FM edits of the existing aircraft for accuracy, as some aircraft are quite plainly not entirely right."

And how do you know what is exactly historical correct? Vamir already proved with his findings that the Ta152c was near as dam to olegs "interpretation" of historical data. Then you whine about the spitfire`s climb rate which tbh is pretty much comparable in game (MkV 3,140 ft/min, 109 g-1 3,427 ft/min) Infact your totally missing the point on which im trying to get across, changing Fm or talioring exsiting planes on "new slots" because an individual thinks its "wrong" is ludicrous. Do you think that you gain some kind of godly like status by saying "that plane does not fly correctly" of it doesnt fly like it looks". No you dont. I feel for oleg in the old days.. listening to people constantly whining about thier favourite rides and how wrong it is. Now its the people at AAA i feel sorry for.

At the end of the day you should be gratefull that someone has taken the time out of thier lives to offer you something remotley close to how something flew with the OLD FM engine of this game. If your still not happy then maybe you should be looking at getting flying lesons buy a warbird THEN tell us it doesnt fly right. OR quite simply wait for B.O.B?

get a grip and learn to fly your ride properly.

P.s if you strugling in offline games , i wouldnt cross over into online dogfights if i were you :wink:
Thread Closed


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)