28.05.2009, 03:17
Just wondering a little.
When we look at this map and others for that sake we see from above what looks like a forrest or clusters of trees.
You fly down and there is no trees but they are a flat image on the tile.
Further away there are trees in 3d.
Wouldnt it be better looking if the flat image on the tile accually got covered with trees instead of just being a flat image and where theire are 3d trees just remove them??
Or keep some as i guess the image the tile is made up of is of newer date and have less forrest then in 1940.
Or maybe this is a task that is to large to undertake??
just asking!!!!
When we look at this map and others for that sake we see from above what looks like a forrest or clusters of trees.
You fly down and there is no trees but they are a flat image on the tile.
Further away there are trees in 3d.
Wouldnt it be better looking if the flat image on the tile accually got covered with trees instead of just being a flat image and where theire are 3d trees just remove them??
Or keep some as i guess the image the tile is made up of is of newer date and have less forrest then in 1940.
Or maybe this is a task that is to large to undertake??
just asking!!!!