"Realistic" vs "Fantasy" debate
#4

Interesting question, but I think most people here could easily tell what's 'Fantasy' vs Historical without any additional naming conventions.

I get the impression that most (not all, but most,) are interested in historical (or, more historical than IL-2 originally had,) - for with real aircraft there is data. For fantasy aircraft (aside from the proposed specs which may or may not have been true), you are butting up against any game engine limitations, which no one knows how close it would be to a proposed aircraft.

Just my opinion.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)