"Realistic" vs "Fantasy" debate
#31

It's only about labelling add-on A/C that didn't make it to the construction boards?


I'm all with you. Easy, because:

1, Even if forum users are in the know of what had been aloft then many new players and occasional ones aren't!

2, As stated, being shot down by "heat seeking missiles"/Uber planes will give those players an impression doing disservice to real WW2 pilots

(Why had they been shot down in high/low numbers? To dumb to hit a barn door? Wontehwarplanes.... :???: )

3, No effort is lost, every plane MOD will find its pilots. Forumwise vivid concerns about server population and planeset bannings won't give the majority of players (offliners) sh*t to care about. They'll enjoy the new mounts big time nevertheless.

4, A bracket labelled "(fictional)" for non-historicals would be spot on, no need to label "HST"s. Nission makers and not so experienced server admins will benefit from a not so prolific use of suffices. Kind of evens out a mark to be outstanding. Labels like "1946" or "1947" contain big amounts of guess-work. No recomendation towards that, especially as revolver cannons on "1945" planes (Me410) have not been used historically in 1945.


Greets,
Pongie
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)