21.07.2009, 12:46
I too am grateful for the addition of imaginative modelers and coders who have given me not only some nice what ifs, but a crop of planes that I historically had no exposure on. Bottom line was that I learned a lot from exploring what others thought was interesting, even if I wasn't interested from the start- the concept won out because it was a good one (no matter how I felt about it).
But I digress. I believe the original poster's question was The question was whether "fantasy" ("what-if", "alternate history") modded planes should be clearly marked as such or not - or even if they should be allowed on AAA at all.
People have provided arguments both pro and con- perhaps what the relevant factor will be if the participants feel if it is worth the effort or not. Getting their buy-in is essential in implementing any such change in naming conventions.
I guess having it for those not knowing if it is fantasy or not get more info, while people who do know just have another set of naming conventions to deal with.
But I digress. I believe the original poster's question was The question was whether "fantasy" ("what-if", "alternate history") modded planes should be clearly marked as such or not - or even if they should be allowed on AAA at all.
People have provided arguments both pro and con- perhaps what the relevant factor will be if the participants feel if it is worth the effort or not. Getting their buy-in is essential in implementing any such change in naming conventions.
I guess having it for those not knowing if it is fantasy or not get more info, while people who do know just have another set of naming conventions to deal with.