[Chaoic16]

my take on this debate.. short and sweet..

Historic and accurate aircraft that saw active duty..Yes, of course.

What ifs and prototypes.. No, waste of time.

Disagreed, experimental and 'what ifs' *based on an offiical documents and blueprints of practical design* is worth it. However, it is not what this debate is about, I will quote an author of this thread to state what this thread is all about:

Those are fair points mate but that's not what this discussion should be about.

The question here is, should these be clearly marked as such, to make them immediately distinguishable from the historical planes?

So see, this thread is about labelling each aircraft historical and alternative historical aircraft, respectfully.




Chaoic out...