23.10.2009, 22:22
Read your own charts since you so willingly gave them. There were no external loads and the internal fuel was lightened by 89 gallons. Naturally, it's going to go faster than it would normally too. It's a test in a mostly controlled enviroment, not combat conditions. Oh yeah, now that you mention it, the hp is correct for take-off. My bad on the 1650-3 suggestion. I didn't read the numbers right. Okay, can we quit with the source thing now. I've given you proof that's legitimate to begin with and now I've backed it. Can we please stop this performance bashing too...