Rise of Flight Limitations
#8

Some issues in RoF are in the list to get done because the hardcore RoFers have pushed the devs to it, the windsock issue for example. We have a working windsock! Big Grin And others are from the list of people(usually the same hardcore folks) on the forum pushing to change what, to some, doesn't work for them to what will work for them by promoting an issue that the devs will notice. ACE I feel your pain and see your point of view, as well. To each his own, I say, and let me qualify myself by saying IL-2 1946 HSFX/UP2, and 3rd party mods in general rock, too! Now, imho, Rise of Flight has the same potential as IL-2 to reach the high pinnacle of sim-dom. I'm with philip.ed that we need patience and vigilance with the devs to get what many of us would love, another jewel in the very small patch of sims.

Moreover, neoqb/777 are a very small company of dedicated WWI enthusiasts and some funds their way helps them to make a better sim. Your voice backed by a donation is much more potent than those who don't but complain it's not perfect, or simply not good enough(just a statement, I assume you already know this). Honestly, it's not like there's a lot of sims to choose from in such a minuscule niche market. I support IL-2, WoP, RoF, OFF, DCS: Blackshark, FC2, et al. I would like them all to succeed. They're in there own unique way a testament to the survival of us who love and enjoy the beauty of flight, and the deadly struggle of aerial combat in the virtual skies. In total, for me at least, they're all equal in different ways, as a reiteration.

Lastly, to Dietz, I feel more challenged by the FM in RoF than I do in IL-2. Rise of Flight, especially my beloved Camel, gives me a smooth but difficult ride, with respect and my opinion only, I think the aircraft in RoF are just right but with only some minor complaints. Love your art, great picture! Respect to all.... Big Grin
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)