27.11.2009, 18:27
OK Ace of Aces ,
I think you just want to have the most possible perfect F-86 in the game , and I understand this cause I about this totally agree with you ...
If I ve the time , I will explain in a good english why I dont believe in the curves , I have some friends who speak a better english than me and they will translate ...
But few words ...
You have the right to not agree with me , but I think you don t understand my goal ...
Perhaps a short sentence could make you understand : I want the most possible realistic plane when I take it IN GAME ! Not just reading some numbers ... I ve flown on this simulator 10 years ago ( from the beginning ) , it a fantastic simulator but now I d like to solve some things I don t like , anemic engines ...etc ...
When you give the simulator to some real fighter pilots , they say all the same thing ... So It s necessary to improve the simulator ... I d like to be in the situation of a real pilot when I take this game and it s my goal ....
Sure I m constantly looking at the books , the curves , the numbers , but I m trying to make them ALIVE in the game ... Cause if you just take the historical numbers and put them in the FM , you have not a good result , you have to make an optimization ...
Il2 compare is a very good test to see the difference between two planes in the game , but not very accurate if you try to put the test on a real curve ...
It don t take all the FM ( java class ) , and forget a lot of things from the planes ...
In my update , I ve put more G effects , put a realistic landing ( no more than - 10 feets per second at touch down ) , problems with the bombs under the wings ...etc ...etc ...
Gradualy I will improve all I can ...
Try to make your FM only from the curves if you believe that it s the best ...
I think it s a good thing to have different points of view ...
But when all will be finished , try an honnest fly with the Corea mod , not just a track from IL2 compare , and you ll see whish mod is the most realistic when you take it in game ...
Best regards
I think you just want to have the most possible perfect F-86 in the game , and I understand this cause I about this totally agree with you ...
If I ve the time , I will explain in a good english why I dont believe in the curves , I have some friends who speak a better english than me and they will translate ...
But few words ...
You have the right to not agree with me , but I think you don t understand my goal ...
Perhaps a short sentence could make you understand : I want the most possible realistic plane when I take it IN GAME ! Not just reading some numbers ... I ve flown on this simulator 10 years ago ( from the beginning ) , it a fantastic simulator but now I d like to solve some things I don t like , anemic engines ...etc ...
When you give the simulator to some real fighter pilots , they say all the same thing ... So It s necessary to improve the simulator ... I d like to be in the situation of a real pilot when I take this game and it s my goal ....
Sure I m constantly looking at the books , the curves , the numbers , but I m trying to make them ALIVE in the game ... Cause if you just take the historical numbers and put them in the FM , you have not a good result , you have to make an optimization ...
Il2 compare is a very good test to see the difference between two planes in the game , but not very accurate if you try to put the test on a real curve ...
It don t take all the FM ( java class ) , and forget a lot of things from the planes ...
In my update , I ve put more G effects , put a realistic landing ( no more than - 10 feets per second at touch down ) , problems with the bombs under the wings ...etc ...etc ...
Gradualy I will improve all I can ...
Try to make your FM only from the curves if you believe that it s the best ...
I think it s a good thing to have different points of view ...
But when all will be finished , try an honnest fly with the Corea mod , not just a track from IL2 compare , and you ll see whish mod is the most realistic when you take it in game ...
Best regards